Mathematical evaluation of jumping distance in total hip arthroplasty: influence of abduction angle, femoral head offset, and head diameter
- PMID: 19421906
- PMCID: PMC2823207
- DOI: 10.3109/17453670902988378
Mathematical evaluation of jumping distance in total hip arthroplasty: influence of abduction angle, femoral head offset, and head diameter
Abstract
Background and purpose: The jumping distance (JD) is the degree of lateral translation of the femoral head center required before dislocation occurs. The smaller the distance, the higher the theoretical risk of dislocation. The aim of our study was to evaluate this jumping distance and its variation according to the characteristics of the implant, and also the theoretical gain in using large head diameters of above 38 mm.
Methods: The JD was calculated as a function of the cup anteversion and abduction angles, the head diameter, and the head offset (defined as the distance between the center of the femoral head and the cup opening plane). Head diameters of 28, 32, 36, 40, 44 and 48 mm were analyzed. The abduction angle was increased from 0 degrees to 80 degrees with a 10 degree increment. The anteversion angle was increased from 0 degrees to 40 degrees with a 5 degree increment.
Results: The jumping distance was found to decrease as the cup abduction angle increased (0.25 mm each 1 degree for 32-mm head diameter). It increased by 0.05 mm for a 1 degree increase in the anteversion angle. The jumping distance increased as the head diameter increased (0.4 mm each mm diameter for a 45 degree abduction angle). The net gain obtained by increasing the diameter, however, decreased when abduction angle increased (0.25 each mm diameter for 60 degree abduction). The JD decreased by 0.92 mm for each 1-mm increase in head offset, showing that head offset was the most important parameter influencing the JD.
Interpretation: The theoretical gain in stability obtained by using a large femoral head (above 36 mm) is negligible in cases where there is a high cup abduction angle. An increase in offset of the femoral head substantially reduces the jumping distance and it should therefore be avoided.
Figures














Similar articles
-
Effect of changing femoral head diameter on bony and prosthetic jumping angles.Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019 Apr;29(3):625-632. doi: 10.1007/s00590-018-2325-5. Epub 2018 Oct 30. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019. PMID: 30377824
-
Influence of Acetabular Shell Position and Component Design on Hip Dynamic Dislocation.J Arthroplasty. 2019 Apr;34(4):766-771. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.12.012. Epub 2018 Dec 17. J Arthroplasty. 2019. PMID: 30639282
-
Hip stability parameters with dual mobility, modular dual mobility and fixed bearing in total hip arthroplasty: an analytical evaluation.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Apr 20;23(1):373. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05280-2. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022. PMID: 35443656 Free PMC article.
-
Femoral offset: anatomical concept, definition, assessment, implications for preoperative templating and hip arthroplasty.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009 May;95(3):210-9. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2009.03.010. Epub 2009 May 6. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009. PMID: 19423418 Review.
-
Intra-prosthetic dislocation of dual-mobility cups after total hip arthroplasty: potential causes from a clinical and biomechanical perspective.Int Orthop. 2016 May;40(5):901-6. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-3000-7. Epub 2015 Oct 1. Int Orthop. 2016. PMID: 26429197 Review.
Cited by
-
Current concepts in hip-spine relationships: making them practical for total hip arthroplasty.EFORT Open Rev. 2022 Jan 11;7(1):59-69. doi: 10.1530/EOR-21-0082. EFORT Open Rev. 2022. PMID: 35073513 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Two year follow up of supercapsular percutaneously assisted total hip arthroplasty.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 May 24;22(1):478. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04351-0. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021. PMID: 34030681 Free PMC article.
-
In vivo creep and wear performance of vitamin-E-diffused highly crosslinked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Dec;143(12):7195-7203. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-04972-1. Epub 2023 Jul 12. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023. PMID: 37438580
-
Five Hundred Fifty-five Retrieved Metal-on-metal Hip Replacements of a Single Design Show a Wide Range of Wear, Surface Features, and Histopathologic Reactions.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Feb;476(2):261-278. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000044. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018. PMID: 29529655 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment of Recurrent Dislocation after Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Advanced Imaging and Three-Dimensional Modeling Techniques: A Case Series.HSS J. 2020 Dec;16(Suppl 2):245-255. doi: 10.1007/s11420-019-09704-z. Epub 2019 Jul 25. HSS J. 2020. PMID: 33380954 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Alberton G, High WA, Morrey BF. Dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty: An Analysis of risk factors and treatment options. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2002;84:1788–92. - PubMed
-
- Amstutz H, Le Duff MJ, Beaule PE. Prevention and treatment of dislocation after total hip replacement using large diameter balls. Clin Orthop. 2004;(429):108–16. - PubMed
-
- Bader R, Willmann G. Ceramic cups for hip endoprostheses. Cup design, inclination and antetorsion angle modify range of motion and impigement. Biomed Tech (Ber) 1999;44(7-8):212–9. - PubMed
-
- Beaule PE, Schmalzried TP, Udomkiat P, Amstutz HC. Jumbo femoral head for the treatment of recurrent dislocation following total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2002;84:256–63. - PubMed
-
- Fricka K, Marshall A, Paprosky WG. Constrained liners in revision total hip arthroplasty: an overuse syndrome: in the affirmative. J Arthroplasty (4 Suppl 1) 2006;21:126–30. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical