Essure: a review six years later
- PMID: 19423060
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.02.009
Essure: a review six years later
Abstract
Hysteroscopic sterilization is rapidly replacing interval laparoscopic sterilization. Six years after the Food and Drug Administration's approval of Essure hysteroscopic sterilization, U.S. and worldwide literature and clinical experience have confirmed the safety, effectiveness, and low rate of adverse events reported in clinical trials. Essure is highly successful, with a 5-year effectiveness rate of 99.8%, and review of the unintended failures reveals that most can be traced to protocol deviation. The procedure is well tolerated in the office, with high successful bilateral placement rates and high patient satisfaction. Compliance and technical issues with the 3-month confirmation test are prevalent. Clinical results are consistent with the Phase II and III clinical trials, and long-term changes such as pelvic pain and abnormal bleeding are infrequent. Concomitant endometrial ablation is feasible and effective; however, long-term data are needed. Practitioners will encounter these real-world issues as they increasingly perform this procedure, and suggestions for management are provided.
Similar articles
-
Concomitant hysteroscopic endometrial ablation and Essure procedure: feasibility, efficacy and satisfaction.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Jul;178:51-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.03.023. Epub 2014 Apr 25. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014. PMID: 24813100
-
The feasibility, success and patient satisfaction associated with outpatient hysteroscopic sterilisation.BJOG. 2007 Jun;114(6):676-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01351.x. BJOG. 2007. PMID: 17516957
-
Techniques for removal of the Essure hysteroscopic tubal occlusion device.Fertil Steril. 2007 Aug;88(2):497.e13-4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.072. Epub 2007 Mar 29. Fertil Steril. 2007. PMID: 17397840
-
Practical tips for office hysteroscopy and second-generation "global" endometrial ablation.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009 Jul-Aug;16(4):384-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.04.002. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009. PMID: 19573815 Review.
-
Contemporary hysteroscopic methods for female sterilization.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010 Jan;108(1):79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.07.026. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010. PMID: 19716128 Review.
Cited by
-
Efficacy, safety, and patient acceptability of the Essure™ procedure.Patient Prefer Adherence. 2011 Apr 28;5:207-12. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S12400. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2011. PMID: 21573052 Free PMC article.
-
Tubal risk markers for failure to place transcervical sterilization coils.Contraception. 2012 Apr;85(4):384-8. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.09.004. Epub 2011 Oct 27. Contraception. 2012. PMID: 22036044 Free PMC article.
-
Incidence and risk factors for chronic pelvic pain after hysteroscopic sterilization.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Mar-Apr;22(3):390-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.06.007. Epub 2014 Jun 19. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015. PMID: 24952343 Free PMC article.
-
Preprocedure patient preferences and attitudes toward permanent contraceptive options.Patient Prefer Adherence. 2012;6:331-6. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S30247. Epub 2012 Apr 17. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2012. PMID: 22563241 Free PMC article.
-
Factors Associated with Negative Patient Experiences with Essure Sterilization.JSLS. 2020 Jan-Mar;24(1):e2019.00065. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2019.00065. JSLS. 2020. PMID: 32206011 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical