Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2009 May;18(5):1610-6.
doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0745.

Five polymorphisms and breast cancer risk: results from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium

Mia M Gaudet  1 Roger L MilneAngela CoxNicola J CampEllen L GoodeManjeet K HumphreysAlison M DunningJonathan MorrisonGraham G GilesGianluca SeveriLaura BagliettoDallas R EnglishFergus J CouchJanet E OlsonXianshu WangJenny Chang-ClaudeDieter Flesch-JanysSascha AbbasRamona SalazarArto MannermaaVesa KatajaVeli-Matti KosmaAnnika LindblomSara MargolinTuomas HeikkinenKati KämpjärviKirsimari AaltonenHeli NevanlinnaNatalia BogdanovaIrina CoinacPeter SchürmannThilo DörkClaus R BartramRita K SchmutzlerSandrine TchatchouBarbara BurwinkelHiltrud BrauchDiana TorresUte HamannChristina JustenhovenGloria RibasJosé I AriasJavier BenitezStig E BojesenBørge G NordestgaardHenrik L FlygerJulian PetoOlivia FletcherNichola JohnsonIsabel Dos Santos SilvaPeter A FaschingMatthias W BeckmannReiner StrickArif B EkiciAnnegien BroeksMarjanka K SchmidtFlora E van LeeuwenLaura J Van't VeerMelissa C SoutheyJohn L HopperCarmel ApicellaChristopher A HaimanBrian E HendersonLoic Le MarchandLaurence N KolonelVessela KristensenGrethe Grenaker AlnaesDavid J HunterPeter KraftDavid G CoxSusan E HankinsonCaroline SeynaeveMaaike P G VreeswijkRob A E M TollenaarPeter DevileeStephen ChanockJolanta LissowskaLouise BrintonBeata PeplonskaKamila CzenePer HallYuqing LiJianjun LiuSabapathy BalasubramanianSaeed RafiiMalcolm W R ReedKaren A PooleyDon ConroyCaroline BaynesDaehee KangKeun-Young YooDong-Young NohSei-Hyun AhnChen-Yang ShenHui-Chun WangJyh-Cherng YuPei-Ei WuHoda Anton-CulverArgyrios ZiogoasKathleen EganPolly NewcombLinda Titus-ErnstoffAmy Trentham DietzAlice J SigurdsonBruce H AlexanderParveen BhattiKristina Allen-BradyLisa A Cannon-AlbrightJathine WongAustralian Ovarian Cancer Study GroupGeorgia Chenevix-TrenchAmanda B SpurdleJonathan BeesleyPaul D P PharoahDoug F EastonMontserrat Garcia-ClosasBreast Cancer Association Consortium
Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Five polymorphisms and breast cancer risk: results from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium

Mia M Gaudet et al. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 May.

Abstract

Previous studies have suggested that minor alleles for ERCC4 rs744154, TNF rs361525, CASP10 rs13010627, PGR rs1042838, and BID rs8190315 may influence breast cancer risk, but the evidence is inconclusive due to their small sample size. These polymorphisms were genotyped in more than 30,000 breast cancer cases and 30,000 controls, primarily of European descent, from 30 studies in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. We calculated odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) as a measure of association. We found that the minor alleles for these polymorphisms were not related to invasive breast cancer risk overall in women of European descent: ECCR4 per-allele OR (95% CI) = 0.99 (0.97-1.02), minor allele frequency = 27.5%; TNF 1.00 (0.95-1.06), 5.0%; CASP10 1.02 (0.98-1.07), 6.5%; PGR 1.02 (0.99-1.06), 15.3%; and BID 0.98 (0.86-1.12), 1.7%. However, we observed significant between-study heterogeneity for associations with risk for single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in CASP10, PGR, and BID. Estimates were imprecise for women of Asian and African descent due to small numbers and lower minor allele frequencies (with the exception of BID SNP). The ORs for each copy of the minor allele were not significantly different by estrogen or progesterone receptor status, nor were any significant interactions found between the polymorphisms and age or family history of breast cancer. In conclusion, our data provide persuasive evidence against an overall association between invasive breast cancer risk and ERCC4 rs744154, TNF rs361525, CASP10 rs13010627, PGR rs1042838, and BID rs8190315 genotypes among women of European descent.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Per-allele ORs and 95% CIs for breast cancer risk by study are shown for ERCC4 rs744154 (A), TNF rs361525 (B), CASP10 rs13010627 (C), PGR rs1042838 (D), and BID rs8190315 (E), based on data from ~30,000 cases and 30,000 controls from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. Studies are weighted and ranked according to the inverse of the variance of the log OR estimate. The size of the box is inversely proportional to the variance of the log OR estimate. The solid line is drawn where OR is equal to 1.0, and the dotted line is at the OR estimate for all studies combined. Estimates were calculated separately for women of European, Asian (labeled as “Asian”), and African (labeled as “AA”) descent. Study acronyms are defined in Supplementary Table S1.

References

    1. Milne RL, Ribas G, Gonzalez-Neira A, et al. ERCC4 associated with breast cancer risk: a two-stage case-control study using high-throughput genotyping. Cancer Res. 2006;66:9420 – 7. - PubMed
    1. Gaudet MM, Egan KM, Lissowska J, et al. Genetic variation in tumor necrosis factor and lymphotoxin-α(TNF-LTA) and breast cancer risk. Hum Genet. 2007;121:483 – 90. - PubMed
    1. MacPherson G, Healey CS, Teare MD, et al. Association of a common variant of the CASP8 gene with reduced risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:1866 – 9. - PubMed
    1. Breast Cancer Association C. Commonly studied single-nucleotide polymorphisms and breast cancer: results from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:1382 – 96. - PubMed
    1. Laird NM, Mosteller F. Some statistical methods for combining experimental results. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1990;6:5–30. - PubMed

Publication types