Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011:2011:467014.
doi: 10.1093/ecam/nep035. Epub 2011 Jun 23.

Cupping for treating pain: a systematic review

Affiliations

Cupping for treating pain: a systematic review

Jong-In Kim et al. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2011.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the evidence for or against the effectiveness of cupping as a treatment option for pain. Fourteen databases were searched. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) testing cupping in patients with pain of any origin were considered. Trials using cupping with or without drawing blood were included, while trials comparing cupping with other treatments of unproven efficacy were excluded. Trials with cupping as concomitant treatment together with other treatments of unproven efficacy were excluded. Trials were also excluded if pain was not a central symptom of the condition. The selection of studies, data extraction and validation were performed independently by three reviewers. Seven RCTs met all the inclusion criteria. Two RCTs suggested significant pain reduction for cupping in low back pain compared with usual care (P < .01) and analgesia (P < .001). Another two RCTs also showed positive effects of cupping in cancer pain (P < .05) and trigeminal neuralgia (P < .01) compared with anticancer drugs and analgesics, respectively. Two RCTs reported favorable effects of cupping on pain in brachialgia compared with usual care (P = .03) or heat pad (P < .001). The other RCT failed to show superior effects of cupping on pain in herpes zoster compared with anti-viral medication (P = .065). Currently there are few RCTs testing the effectiveness of cupping in the management of pain. Most of the existing trials are of poor quality. Therefore, more rigorous studies are required before the effectiveness of cupping for the treatment of pain can be determined.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of trial selection process. RCT: randomized clinical trial; CCT: non-randomized controlled clinical trial; UCT: uncontrolled clinical trial.

References

    1. Astin JA. Why patients use alternative medicine: results of a national study. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1998;279(19):1548–1553. - PubMed
    1. Fleming S, Rabago DP, Mundt MP, Fleming MF. CAM therapies among primary care patients using opioid therapy for chronic pain. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2007;7 Article ID 15. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chirali IZ. Cupping Therapy. Philadelphia, Pa, USA: Elservier; 2007.
    1. Yoo SS, Tausk F. Cupping: East meets West. International Journal of Dermatology. 2004;43(9):664–665. - PubMed
    1. Kwon YD, Cho HJ. Systematic review of cupping including bloodletting therapy for musculoskeletal diseases in Korea. Korean Journal of Oriental Physiology & Pathology. 2007;21:789–793.

LinkOut - more resources