Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 May 11:9:76.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-76.

Differences between immigrant and non-immigrant groups in the use of primary medical care; a systematic review

Affiliations

Differences between immigrant and non-immigrant groups in the use of primary medical care; a systematic review

Ellen Uiters et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Studies on differences between immigrant and non-immigrant groups in health care utilization vary with respect to the extent and direction of differences in use. Therefore, our study aimed to provide a systematic overview of the existing research on differences in primary care utilization between immigrant groups and the majority population.

Methods: For this review PubMed, PsycInfo, Cinahl, Sociofile, Web of Science and Current Contents were consulted. Study selection and quality assessment was performed using a predefined protocol by 2 reviewers independently of each other. Only original, quantitative, peer-reviewed papers were taken into account. To account for this hierarchical structure, logistic multilevel analyses were performed to examine the extent to which differences are found across countries and immigrant groups. Differences in primary care use were related to study characteristics, strength of the primary care system and methodological quality.

Results: A total of 37 studies from 7 countries met all inclusion criteria. Remarkably, studies performed within the US more often reported a significant lower use among immigrant groups as compared to the majority population than the other countries. As studies scored higher on methodological quality, the likelihood of reporting significant differences increased. Adjustment for health status and use of culture-/language-adjusted procedures during the data collection were negatively related to reporting significant differences in the studies.

Conclusion: Our review underlined the need for careful design in studies of differences in health care use between immigrant groups and the majority population. The results from studies concerning differences between immigrant and the majority population in primary health care use performed within the US might be interpreted as a reflection of a weaker primary care system in the US compared to Europe and Canada.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow of included studies. The figure shows the numbers of included and excluded studies during the review process.

References

    1. Rosenbach ML, Adamache KW, Khandker RK. Variation in medicare access and satisfaction by health status: 1991–93. Health Care Financ Rev. 1995;17:29–49. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cooper H, Smaje C, Arber S. Use of health services by children and young people according to ethnicity and social class: secondary analysis of a national survey. BMJ. 1998;317:1047–1051. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reijneveld SA. Reported health, lifestyles and use of health care of first generation immigrants in the Netherlands: do socioeconomic factors explain their adverse position? Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. 1998;52:298–304. doi: 10.1136/jech.52.5.298. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wells KB, Hough RL, Golding JM, Burnam MA, Karno M. Which Mexican-Americans underutilize health services? Am J Psychiatry. 1987;144:918–922. - PubMed
    1. Wells KB, Golding JM, Hough RL, Burnam MA, Karno M. Acculturation and the probability of use of health services by Mexican Americans. Health Serv Res. 1989;24:237–257. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms