Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 Aug;148(2):272-276.e2.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.03.014. Epub 2009 May 7.

The Effect of the AcrySof natural lens on glare disability and photostress

Affiliations
Comparative Study

The Effect of the AcrySof natural lens on glare disability and photostress

Billy R Hammond et al. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate whether implanting "blue-filtering" yellow intraocular lenses (IOL) could provide a visual benefit in terms of glare disability and photostress recovery.

Design: A case-control study.

Methods: Researchers masked to group assignments tested 58 subjects: 17 with yellow IOLs (AcrySof Natural; SN60WF; Alcon Laboratories Inc, Fort Worth, Texas, USA), 20 with clear IOLs, and 21 phakic controls. Photostress recovery and visual acuity under veiling glare conditions were assessed in a Maxwellian view optical system. Photostress recovery was assessed by measuring the time required to detect a grating stimulus (1 degree diameter) after a 5-second exposure to an intense circular disk (1 degree diameter) of broad-band xenon light. For the veiling glare experiment, subjects fixated on the grating stimulus, and the intensity of a broad-band xenon annulus (the glare source, 10 degrees inner, 12 degrees outer diameter) was adjusted until the grating stimulus was no longer seen.

Results: Subjects with AcrySof Natural (P < .0001) and clear IOLs (P < .035) could withstand significantly more light than the phakic controls. Subjects with the AcrySof Natural lens could withstand significantly more light (P < .02) than subjects with clear IOLs. Photostress recovery was significantly longer for subjects with clear IOLs vs phakic controls (P < .01), but the AcrySof Natural lens was not different from phakic controls (P < .09). Photostress recovery was similar between subjects with clear or AcrySof Natural lens (P < .32).

Conclusion: The AcrySof Natural lens is related to reduced glare disability relative to a clear IOL or phakic controls.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00710996.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

Associated data