Antitumor vaccines, immunotherapy and the immunological constant of rejection
- PMID: 19431094
- PMCID: PMC3410731
Antitumor vaccines, immunotherapy and the immunological constant of rejection
Abstract
Anticancer vaccines have not matched the clinical expectations projected from their ability to induce consistently systemic anticancer T-cell responses. Thus, a dichotomy is observed between the immunological and clinical endpoints of anticancer immunization. Anticancer vaccines have clearly demonstrated that highly specific T-cell responses can be induced that can recognize autologous cancer antigens in patients with cancer. This ability is an outstanding achievement of modern biotechnology, yielding one of the most specific types of potential anticancer reagents. However, systemic, vaccine-induced anticancer responses exemplify a broader immunological paradox: cytotoxic T-cells can coexist within the same organism with their target cells not only in the context of cancer, but also in the context of chronic infections, well-controlled allo-transplant reactions and autoimmunity. According to this view, anticancer immune responses are a facet of a tissue-specific autoimmune phenomenon specific for cancer tissue that may or may not result in the successful immune-destruction of target cells, depending on an assortment of genetic factors related to the background of the host or evolving phenotypes of a heterogeneous cancer environment. This feature article summarizes the current understanding of the mechanisms leading to tumor rejection in humans as well as in experimental models, in the context of the broader immunological phenomenon leading to tissue-specific destruction. Anticancer vaccines that may not induce clinically significant anticancer responses independently could function as a unique tool to enhance the specificity of the response of the host against cancer, provided that strategies are implemented to amplify the immune reaction initiated by vaccine-induced antibodies and/or T-cells.
Similar articles
-
Overview of melanoma vaccines and promising approaches.Curr Oncol Rep. 2004 Sep;6(5):414-20. doi: 10.1007/s11912-004-0069-3. Curr Oncol Rep. 2004. PMID: 15291987 Review.
-
Vaccines and melanoma.Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2014 Jun;28(3):559-69. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2014.02.008. Epub 2014 Apr 3. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2014. PMID: 24880947 Review.
-
Strategies to enhance the therapeutic activity of cancer vaccines: using melanoma as a model.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Sep;1174:107-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04935.x. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009. PMID: 19769743
-
Failure of cancer vaccines: the significant limitations of this approach to immunotherapy.Anticancer Res. 2000 Jul-Aug;20(4):2665-76. Anticancer Res. 2000. PMID: 10953341 Review.
-
T-cell-based immunotherapy of melanoma: what have we learned and how can we improve?Expert Rev Vaccines. 2004 Apr;3(2):171-87. doi: 10.1586/14760584.3.2.171. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2004. PMID: 15056043 Review.
Cited by
-
A pre-existing coordinated inflammatory microenvironment is associated with complete response of vulvar high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions to different forms of immunotherapy.Int J Cancer. 2020 Nov 15;147(10):2914-2923. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33168. Epub 2020 Jul 3. Int J Cancer. 2020. PMID: 32574376 Free PMC article.
-
Immunotherapy for melanoma: current status and perspectives.J Immunother. 2010 Jul-Aug;33(6):570-90. doi: 10.1097/CJI.0b013e3181e032e8. J Immunother. 2010. PMID: 20551839 Free PMC article. Review.
-
JTM's Tumor immunology goes broad: announcing the Immunobiology and Immunotherapy section.J Transl Med. 2013 Jan 4;11:2. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-11-2. J Transl Med. 2013. PMID: 23289983 Free PMC article.
-
Biological Landscape of Triple Negative Breast Cancers Expressing CTLA-4.Front Oncol. 2020 Aug 5;10:1206. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01206. eCollection 2020. Front Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32850353 Free PMC article.
-
Emerging concepts in biomarker discovery; the US-Japan Workshop on Immunological Molecular Markers in Oncology.J Transl Med. 2009 Jun 17;7:45. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-7-45. J Transl Med. 2009. PMID: 19534815 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Mantovani A, Romero P, Palucka AK, Marincola FM. Tumor immunity: Effector response to tumor and the influence of the microenvironment. Lancet. 2008;371(9614):771–783. - PubMed
-
- Wang E, Worschech A, Marincola FM. The immunologic constant of rejection. Trends Immunol. 2008;29(6):256–262. - PubMed
-
- Albini A, Mirisola V, Pfeffer U. Metastasis signatures: Genes regulating tumor-microenvironment interactions predict metastatic behavior. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2008;27(1):75–83. - PubMed
-
- Kaech SM, Hemby S, Kersh E, Ahmed R. Molecular and functional profiling of memory CD8 T cell differentiation. Cell. 2002;111(6):837–851. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources