Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 May;12(5):297-301.

Antitumor vaccines, immunotherapy and the immunological constant of rejection

Affiliations
Review

Antitumor vaccines, immunotherapy and the immunological constant of rejection

Ena Wang et al. IDrugs. 2009 May.

Abstract

Anticancer vaccines have not matched the clinical expectations projected from their ability to induce consistently systemic anticancer T-cell responses. Thus, a dichotomy is observed between the immunological and clinical endpoints of anticancer immunization. Anticancer vaccines have clearly demonstrated that highly specific T-cell responses can be induced that can recognize autologous cancer antigens in patients with cancer. This ability is an outstanding achievement of modern biotechnology, yielding one of the most specific types of potential anticancer reagents. However, systemic, vaccine-induced anticancer responses exemplify a broader immunological paradox: cytotoxic T-cells can coexist within the same organism with their target cells not only in the context of cancer, but also in the context of chronic infections, well-controlled allo-transplant reactions and autoimmunity. According to this view, anticancer immune responses are a facet of a tissue-specific autoimmune phenomenon specific for cancer tissue that may or may not result in the successful immune-destruction of target cells, depending on an assortment of genetic factors related to the background of the host or evolving phenotypes of a heterogeneous cancer environment. This feature article summarizes the current understanding of the mechanisms leading to tumor rejection in humans as well as in experimental models, in the context of the broader immunological phenomenon leading to tissue-specific destruction. Anticancer vaccines that may not induce clinically significant anticancer responses independently could function as a unique tool to enhance the specificity of the response of the host against cancer, provided that strategies are implemented to amplify the immune reaction initiated by vaccine-induced antibodies and/or T-cells.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mantovani A, Romero P, Palucka AK, Marincola FM. Tumor immunity: Effector response to tumor and the influence of the microenvironment. Lancet. 2008;371(9614):771–783. - PubMed
    1. Wang E, Worschech A, Marincola FM. The immunologic constant of rejection. Trends Immunol. 2008;29(6):256–262. - PubMed
    1. Albini A, Mirisola V, Pfeffer U. Metastasis signatures: Genes regulating tumor-microenvironment interactions predict metastatic behavior. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2008;27(1):75–83. - PubMed
    1. Kaech SM, Hemby S, Kersh E, Ahmed R. Molecular and functional profiling of memory CD8 T cell differentiation. Cell. 2002;111(6):837–851. - PubMed
    1. Ascierto PA, Kirkwood JM. Adjuvant therapy of melanoma with interferon: Lessons of the past decade. J Transl Med. 2008;6:62. - PMC - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources