A controlled, randomized nonblinded clinical trial to assess the efficacy of amphotericin B deoxycholate as compared to pentamidine for the treatment of antimony unresponsive visceral leishmaniasis cases in Bihar, India
- PMID: 19436614
- PMCID: PMC2697519
A controlled, randomized nonblinded clinical trial to assess the efficacy of amphotericin B deoxycholate as compared to pentamidine for the treatment of antimony unresponsive visceral leishmaniasis cases in Bihar, India
Abstract
Background: There is significant variation in Amphotericin B (AMB) efficacy and relapses in antimony unresponsive visceral leishmaniasis (VL) cases over a period of time (10-15 years). Keeping in mind the above mentioned view this study was undertaken with an objective to assess the magnitude of cure and relapse rates of AMB in the treatment of antimony unresponsive VL cases.
Methods: In a controlled, randomized nonblinded clinical trial, we evaluated the cure and relapse rate of Amphotericin B deoxycholate as compared to pentamidine. A total of 82 sodium stibogluconate (SSG) unresponsive and parasitologically confirmed VL cases were included in this study and randomized into two groups, test (Amphotericin B) and control (Pentamidine). Both the groups were treated with recommended dosages (as per World Health Organization guidelines) of respective medicines. All the patients were followed up on 1st, 2nd, and 6th month after end of treatment.
Results: Apparent cure rate in the Amphotericin B group was found to be 95% (39/41) compared with 83% (34/41) in the Pentamidine group, which shows significant statistical difference (p = 0.05). The ultimate cure rate was found 92% (38/41) in the Amphotericin B group compared to 73% (30/41) in the Pentamidine group, which shows a significant statistical difference (Yates corrected chi-square = 4.42, p = 0.04). Similarly, significant statistical difference was observed in the relapse rate of the Amphotericin group compared to the Pentamidine group (p = 0.03).
Conclusions: AMB may still be the drug of choice in the management of resistant VL cases in Bihar, India. This is due to its consistent apparent cure rate (95%), low relapse rate (2.5%), and cost effectiveness compared with other available antileishmanial drugs. It is a safe drug even in case of pregnancy. Efforts should be taken to form a future strategy so that this drug and coming newer drugs do not meet a similar fate as has happened to SSG and pentamidine over a span of 10-15 years.
Similar articles
-
A randomized clinical trial of low dosage combination of pentamidine and allopurinol in the treatment of antimony unresponsive cases of visceral leishmaniasis.J Assoc Physicians India. 2001 Jun;49:609-13. J Assoc Physicians India. 2001. PMID: 11584934 Clinical Trial.
-
Epidemiological, clinical & pharmacological study of antimony-resistant visceral leishmaniasis in Bihar, India.Indian J Med Res. 2004 Sep;120(3):166-72. Indian J Med Res. 2004. PMID: 15489554
-
Observations on amphotericin B treatment of kala-azar given in a rural set up in Bihar, India.Indian J Med Res. 2001 Jan;113:14-8. Indian J Med Res. 2001. PMID: 11280166
-
Visceral leishmaniasis - current therapeutic modalities.Indian J Med Res. 2006 Mar;123(3):345-52. Indian J Med Res. 2006. PMID: 16778315 Review.
-
[Canine leishmaniasis: evolution of the chemotherapeutic protocols].Parassitologia. 2004 Jun;46(1-2):231-4. Parassitologia. 2004. PMID: 15305724 Review. Italian.
Cited by
-
Species-directed therapy for leishmaniasis in returning travellers: a comprehensive guide.PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014 May 1;8(5):e2832. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002832. eCollection 2014 May. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014. PMID: 24787001 Free PMC article.
-
Current challenges in treatment options for visceral leishmaniasis in India: a public health perspective.Infect Dis Poverty. 2016 Mar 8;5:19. doi: 10.1186/s40249-016-0112-2. Infect Dis Poverty. 2016. PMID: 26951132 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Immunotherapy and targeted therapies in treatment of visceral leishmaniasis: current status and future prospects.Front Immunol. 2014 Jun 26;5:296. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00296. eCollection 2014. Front Immunol. 2014. PMID: 25183962 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Pediatric visceral leishmaniasis in Tartous, Syria.Avicenna J Med. 2020 Oct 13;10(4):223-226. doi: 10.4103/ajm.ajm_168_20. eCollection 2020 Oct-Dec. Avicenna J Med. 2020. PMID: 33437694 Free PMC article.
-
Blood transfusion in the care of patients with visceral leishmaniasis: a review of practices in therapeutic efficacy studies.Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2024 Aug 5;118(8):481-490. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/trae018. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2024. PMID: 38690667 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Guerin P, Olliaro P, Sundar S, et al. Visceral leishmaniasis: current status of control, diagnosis, and treatment, and a proposed research and development agenda. Lancet Infect Dis. 2002;2:494–501. - PubMed
-
- Ranjan A, Sur Dipika Singh VP, Siddiqui NA, et al. Risk factors for Indian Kala-azar. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005;73:74–78. - PubMed
-
- Sundar S, More DK, Singh MK, et al. Failure of Pentavalent antimony in visceral leishmaniasis in India: report from the center of Indian epidemic. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;31:1104–1106. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources