Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009 May 13:9:140.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-140.

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an exposure-based return-to-work programme for patients on sick leave due to common mental disorders: design of a cluster-randomized controlled trial

Erik Noordik  1 , Frank J van Dijk, Karen Nieuwenhuijsen, Jac J L van der Klink
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an exposure-based return-to-work programme for patients on sick leave due to common mental disorders: design of a cluster-randomized controlled trial

Erik Noordik et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: To reduce the duration of sick leave and loss of productivity due to common mental disorders (CMDs), we developed a return-to-work programme to be provided by occupational physicians (OPs) based on the principles of exposure in vivo (RTW-E programme). This study evaluates this programme's effectiveness and cost-effectiveness by comparing it with care as usual (CAU). The three research questions we have are: 1) Is an RTW-E programme more effective in reducing the sick leave of employees with common mental disorders, compared with care as usual? 2) Is an RTW-E programme more effective in reducing sick leave for employees with anxiety disorders compared with employees with other common mental disorders? 3) From a societal perspective, is an RTW-E programme cost-effective compared with care as usual?

Methods/design: This study was designed as a pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial with a one-year follow-up and randomization on the level of OPs. We aimed for 60 OPs in order to include 200 patients. Patients in the intervention group received the RTW-E programme. Patients in the control group received care as usual. Eligible patients had been on sick leave due to common mental disorders for at least two weeks and no longer than eight weeks. As primary outcome measures, we calculated the time until full return to work and the duration of sick leave. Secondary outcome measures were time until partial return to work, prevalence rate of sick leave at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months' follow-up, and scores of symptoms of distress, anxiety, depression, somatization, and fatigue; work capacity; perceived working conditions; self-efficacy for return to work; coping behaviour; avoidance behaviour; patient satisfaction; and work adaptations. As process measures, we used indices of compliance with the intervention in the intervention group and employee-supervisor communication in both groups. Economic costs were calculated from a societal perspective. The total costs consisted of the costs of consuming health care, costs of production loss due to sick leave and reduced productivity, and out-of-pocket costs of patients for travelling to their OP.

Discussion: The results will be published in 2009. The strengths and weaknesses of the study protocol are discussed.

Trial registration: ISRCTN72643128.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Design of the study.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Feltz-Cornelis CM Van der, Meeuwissen JAC, De Jong FJ, Hoedeman R, Elfeddali I. Randomized controlled trial of a psychiatric consultation model for treatment of common mental disorder in the occupational health setting. BMC Health Services Research. 2007;7:1–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Das-Munshi J, Goldberg D, Bebbington PE, Bhugra DK, Brugha TS, Dewey ME, Jenkins R, Stewart R, Prince M. Public health significance of mixed anxiety and depression: beyond current classification. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 2008;192:171–177. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.036707. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Glozier N. Mental ill health and fitness for work. Occup Environ Med. 2002;59:714–720. doi: 10.1136/oem.59.10.714. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sanderson K, Andrews G. Common mental disorders in the workforce: recent findings from descriptive and social epidemiology. Can J Psychiatry. 2006;51:63–75. - PubMed
    1. Aholaa K, Kivimäkia M, Honkonena T, Virtanena M, Koskinenc S, Vahteraa J, Lönnqvist J. Occupational burnout and medically certified sickness absence: a population-based study of Finnish employees. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 2008;64:85–193. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.06.022. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types