Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Feb;6(2):844-61.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph6020844. Epub 2009 Feb 24.

The role of effective communication to enhance participation in screening mammography: a New Zealand case

Affiliations

The role of effective communication to enhance participation in screening mammography: a New Zealand case

Margaret A Brunton. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2009 Feb.

Abstract

Changes in the organisation of health care have dominated policy initiatives over the past two decades in many countries. An increasing reliance on public health initiatives to prevent or detect disease early has resulted in an increase in programs that screen for cancer in the community. In turn, this accentuates the need to persuasively communicate the value of such initiatives to encourage continued participation. Merely placing screening programs into a community setting is not sufficient to ensure that adequate numbers will voluntarily participate regularly to achieve anticipated cost and mortality savings in the population. In this research the influence of managing communication in a public screening mammography program was investigated. The results revealed that significant opportunities were overlooked for reassurance and information during the physical mammography process. In turn, this highlights the influence of constraints imposed by the structure of the screening program and the resources allocated to the process. This research suggests that it is important to address multiple influences, including ethnic differences, when asking questions about the effectiveness of public health policy, particularly when considering the choices women make about ongoing participation in breast screening programs.

Keywords: New Zealand; Screening mammography; policy communication.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Thynne I. Making Sense of Public Management Reform: ‘Drivers’ and ‘Supporters’ in Comparative Perspective. Public Manag. Rev. 2003;5:449–459.
    1. MacDougall C. Thoughts on Barriers and Enablers for Incorporating Ordinary Theorizing into the Community Participation in Health Debate. Aust. Health Rev. 2001;24:30–33. - PubMed
    1. Cheney G, Zorn T. Is Serving a Customer a Noble Mission or Misguided Ideology? At Work. 1999;8:1–3.
    1. Tabar L, Yen MF, Vitak B, Chen HT, Smith RA, Duffy SW. Mammography Service Screening and Mortality in Breast Cancer Patients: 20-Year Follow-Up Before and after Introduction of Screening. Lancet. 2003;361:1405–1410. - PubMed
    1. Greenwood-Haigh L.Mammographic Surveillance in the Follow up of Early Primary Breast Cancer in England: A Cross-sectional Survey Radiography 2008. In press, doi:10.1016/j.radi.2008.08.005