Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Apr;6(4):1485-514.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph6041485. Epub 2009 Apr 20.

Preventing smoking in young people: a systematic review of the impact of access interventions

Lindsay Richardson  1 , Natalie Hemsing, Lorraine Greaves, Sunaina Assanand, Patrice Allen, Lucy McCullough, Linda Bauld, Karin Humphries, Amanda Amos
Affiliations

Preventing smoking in young people: a systematic review of the impact of access interventions

Lindsay Richardson et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2009 Apr.

Abstract

Aims: To examine existing evidence on the effectiveness of interventions that are designed to prevent the illegal sale of tobacco to young people. The review considers specific sub-questions related to the factors that might influence effectiveness, any differential effects for different sub-populations of youth, and barriers and facilitators to implementation.

Methods: A review of studies on the impact of interventions on young people under the age of 18 was conducted. It included interventions that were designed to prevent the illegal sale of tobacco to children and young people. The review was conducted in July 2007, and included 20 papers on access restriction studies. The quality of the papers was assessed and the relevant data was extracted.

Results: The evidence obtained from the review indicates that access restriction interventions may produce significant reductions in the rate of illegal tobacco sales to youth. However, lack of enforcement and the ability of youth to acquire cigarettes from social sources may undermine the effectiveness of these interventions.

Conclusions: When access interventions are applied in a comprehensive manner, they can affect young people's access to tobacco. However, further research is required to examine the effects of access restriction interventions on young people's smoking behaviour.

Keywords: Access restrictions; illegal sales; prevention; tobacco; youth.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Jason LA, Berk M, Schnopp-Wyatt DL, Talbot B. Effects of enforcement of youth access law on smoking prevalence. Am. J. Commun. Psychol. 1999;27:143–160. - PubMed
    1. Action on Smoking and Health (Ash UK) Ash. facts at a glance: Smoking statisticsRetrieved August 8, 2007; Available online: http://newash.org.uk/files/documents/ASH_93.pdf (accessed December 2008).
    1. BMA Board of Science. Breaking the cycle of children's exposure to tobacco smoke. British Medical Association; London, UK: 2007.
    1. ONS. Statistics on smoking: England 2006. ONS; Pittsburgh, PA, USA: 2006.
    1. National Youth Tobacco Survey. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Atlanta, GA, USA: 2006.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources