Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 May;73(5):261-5.

Comparative results of trauma scoring systems in fatal outcomes

Scott M Cinelli  1 , Paula Brady, Carla P Rennie, Cristina Tuluca, Timothy S Hall
Affiliations
  • PMID: 19441759
Comparative Study

Comparative results of trauma scoring systems in fatal outcomes

Scott M Cinelli et al. Conn Med. 2009 May.

Abstract

Background: Trauma scoring systems are vital tools in assessing patient injuries and determining risk of mortality. This study was designed to test which score--the Injury Severity Score (ISS), the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS), TRISS plus comorbidities (TRISSCOM) or the new International Classification of Disease (ICD-9)-Based Injury Severity Score (ICISS)--has the greatest predictive value at a Level 2 trauma center.

Methods: In this retrospective chart review, data for 39 trauma deaths over a 30-month period were collected from the Stamford Hospital Trauma Registry.

Results: Patients with ISS less than 15 who later died were significantly older than patients with ISS from 15 to 24 (P = 0.038) and ISS of 25 (P = 0.013). The TRISSCOM and a modification further stratifying age both produced significantly lower mean survival predictions when compared to other scores (P = 0-0.041). Only the modified TRISSCOM was highly predictive (score < 0.2) in the most severely injured patients (identified by ISS > 25).

Conclusion: The TRISSCOM and its modification performed significantly better than the other scores assessed. Elderly patients may require special treatment when included in scoring system comparisons.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types