Comparative analysis of machine learning methods in ligand-based virtual screening of large compound libraries
- PMID: 19442064
- DOI: 10.2174/138620709788167944
Comparative analysis of machine learning methods in ligand-based virtual screening of large compound libraries
Abstract
Machine learning methods have been explored as ligand-based virtual screening tools for facilitating drug lead discovery. These methods predict compounds of specific pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic or toxicological properties based on their structure-derived structural and physicochemical properties. Increasing attention has been directed at these methods because of their capability in predicting compounds of diverse structures and complex structure-activity relationships without requiring the knowledge of target 3D structure. This article reviews current progresses in using machine learning methods for virtual screening of pharmacodynamically active compounds from large compound libraries, and analyzes and compares the reported performances of machine learning tools with those of structure-based and other ligand-based (such as pharmacophore and clustering) virtual screening methods. The feasibility to improve the performance of machine learning methods in screening large libraries is discussed.
Similar articles
-
Machine learning for virtual screening (part 1).Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2009 May;12(4):330-1. doi: 10.2174/138620709788167999. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2009. PMID: 19442062 No abstract available.
-
Structure-based drug screening and ligand-based drug screening with machine learning.Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2009 May;12(4):397-408. doi: 10.2174/138620709788167890. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2009. PMID: 19442067 Review.
-
Performance of machine learning methods for ligand-based virtual screening.Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2009 May;12(4):358-68. doi: 10.2174/138620709788167962. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2009. PMID: 19442065 Review.
-
Machine learning approaches for predicting compounds that interact with therapeutic and ADMET related proteins.J Pharm Sci. 2007 Nov;96(11):2838-60. doi: 10.1002/jps.20985. J Pharm Sci. 2007. PMID: 17786989 Review.
-
Virtual screening of chemical libraries.Nature. 2004 Dec 16;432(7019):862-5. doi: 10.1038/nature03197. Nature. 2004. PMID: 15602552 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
A two-step target binding and selectivity support vector machines approach for virtual screening of dopamine receptor subtype-selective ligands.PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39076. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039076. Epub 2012 Jun 15. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 22720033 Free PMC article.
-
Active and machine learning-enhanced discovery of new FGFR3 inhibitor, Rhapontin, through virtual screening of receptor structures and anti-cancer activity assessment.Front Mol Biosci. 2024 Jun 11;11:1413214. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2024.1413214. eCollection 2024. Front Mol Biosci. 2024. PMID: 38919748 Free PMC article.
-
The influence of the inactives subset generation on the performance of machine learning methods.J Cheminform. 2013 Apr 5;5(1):17. doi: 10.1186/1758-2946-5-17. J Cheminform. 2013. PMID: 23561266 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of training data size and noise level on support vector machines virtual screening of genotoxic compounds from large compound libraries.J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2011 May;25(5):455-67. doi: 10.1007/s10822-011-9431-3. Epub 2011 May 10. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2011. PMID: 21556903
-
Bioassay Directed Isolation, Biological Evaluation and in Silico Studies of New Isolates from Pteris cretica L.Antioxidants (Basel). 2019 Jul 19;8(7):231. doi: 10.3390/antiox8070231. Antioxidants (Basel). 2019. PMID: 31331076 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical