Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 Aug;53(6):585-94.
doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mep021. Epub 2009 May 14.

Field and wind tunnel comparison of four aerosol samplers using agricultural dusts

Stephen J Reynolds  1 , Jason Nakatsu, Marvin Tillery, Thomas Keefe, John Mehaffy, Peter S Thorne, Kelley Donham, Matthew Nonnenmann, Vijay Golla, Patrick O'shaughnessy
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Field and wind tunnel comparison of four aerosol samplers using agricultural dusts

Stephen J Reynolds et al. Ann Occup Hyg. 2009 Aug.

Abstract

Occupational lung disease is a significant problem among agricultural workers exposed to organic dusts. Measurements of exposure in agricultural environments in the USA have traditionally been conducted using 37-mm closed-face cassettes (CFCs) and respirable Cyclones. Inhalable aerosol samplers offer significant improvement for dose estimation studies to reduce respiratory disease. The goals of this study were to determine correction factors between the inhalable samplers (IOM and Button) and the CFC and Cyclone for dusts sampled in livestock buildings and to determine whether these factors vary among livestock types. Determination of these correction factors will allow comparison between inhalable measurements and historical measurements. Ten sets of samples were collected in swine, chicken, turkey, and dairy facilities in both Colorado and Iowa. Pairs of each sampling device were attached to the front and back of a rotating mannequin. Laboratory studies using a still-air chamber and a wind tunnel provided information regarding the effect of wind speed on sampler performance. Overall, the IOM had the lowest coefficient of variation (best precision) and was least affected by changes in wind speed. The performance of the Button was negatively impacted in poultry environments where larger (feather) particulates clogged the holes in the initial screen. The CFC/IOM ratios are important for comparisons between newer and older studies. Wind speed and dust type were both important factors affecting ratios. Based on the field studies (Table 6), a ratio of 0.56 is suggested as a conversion factor for the CFC/IOM (average for all environments because of no statistical difference). Suggested conversion factors for the Button/IOM are swine (0.57), chicken (0.80), turkey (0.53), and dairy (0.67). Any attempt to apply a conversion factor between the Cyclone and inhalable samplers is not recommended.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Relationship of samplers to IOM for field studies—regression (through 0) (n = 20).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Aizenberg V, Grinshpun SA, Willeke K, et al. Performance characteristics of the Button personal inhalable aerosol sampler. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 2000;61:398–404. - PubMed
    1. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) Threshold limit values for chemical substances and physical agents and biological indices. Cincinnati, OH: ACGIH; 2007.
    1. Bartley DL. Inhalable aerosol samplers. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 1998;13:274–8.
    1. Buchan RM, Soderholm SC, Tillery MI. Aerosol sampling efficiency of 37 mm filter cassettes. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1986;47:825–31. - PubMed
    1. De Vocht F, Huizer D, Prause M, et al. Field comparison of inhalable aerosol samplers applied in the European rubber manufacturing industry. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2006;79:621–9. - PubMed

Publication types