Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 May-Jun;124(3):447-53.
doi: 10.1177/003335490912400315.

Children with orofacial clefts: health-care use and costs among a privately insured population

Affiliations

Children with orofacial clefts: health-care use and costs among a privately insured population

Sheree L Boulet et al. Public Health Rep. 2009 May-Jun.

Abstract

Objectives: Orofacial clefts are common birth defects that often require multiple surgeries and medical treatments during childhood. We used healthcare insurance claims data to estimate health-care expenditures for infants and children < or = 10 years of age with an orofacial cleft.

Methods: The data were derived from the 2000-2004 MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters databases, which include person-specific information on health-care use, expenditures, and enrollment for approximately 50 large employers, health plans, and government and public organizations. Health insurance claims data from 821,619 children < or = 10 years of age enrolled in employer-sponsored plans during 2004 were analyzed. Expenditures for inpatient admissions, outpatient services, and prescription drug claims were calculated for children with and those without an orofacial cleft.

Results: The difference in annual mean costs (i.e., incremental costs) between children aged 0 through 10 years with an orofacial cleft and those without an orofacial cleft was $13,405. The mean and median costs for children < or = 10 years of age with an orofacial cleft were eight times higher than for children of the same age without an orofacial cleft. Mean costs for infants with a cleft and another major, unrelated defect were 25 times higher than those for an infant without a cleft, and five times higher than for infants with an isolated cleft.

Conclusion: These findings document substantially elevated medical care costs for privately insured children with an orofacial cleft. Additional study of the economic burden associated with this condition should include a broader range of economic costs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Mean component costs for children ≤10 years of age with or without an orofacial cleft among a privately insured U.S. population, MarketScan® Research Database, 2004

References

    1. Arosarena OA. Cleft lip and palate. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2007;40:27–60. - PubMed
    1. Canfield MA, Honein MA, Yuskiv N, Xing J, Mai CT, Collins JS, et al. National estimates and race/ethnic-specific variation of selected birth defects in the United States, 1999–2001. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2006;76:747–56. - PubMed
    1. Bender PL. Genetics of cleft lip and palate. J Pediatr Nurs. 2000;15:242–9. - PubMed
    1. Christensen K, Juel K, Herskind AM, Murray JC. Long-term follow-up study of survival associated with cleft lip and palate at birth. BMJ. 2004;328:1405. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ngai CW, Martin WL, Tonks A, Wyldes MP, Kilby MD. Are isolated facial cleft lip and palate associated with increased perinatal mortality? A cohort study from the West Midlands Region, 1995–1997. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2005;17:203–6. - PubMed

Publication types