Intimate partner violence and functional health status: associations with severity, danger, and self-advocacy behaviors
- PMID: 19445614
- PMCID: PMC2872257
- DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2007.0521
Intimate partner violence and functional health status: associations with severity, danger, and self-advocacy behaviors
Erratum in
- J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2009 Jun;18(6):917
Abstract
Objective: To assess physical and mental functional health status as associated with the severity of intimate partner violence (IPV) and perceived danger.
Methods: Prospective cross-sectional survey of all patients aged 18-55 in an urban emergency department during a convenience sample of shifts. Instruments included the George Washington Universal Violence Prevention Screening protocol, administered by computer during the initial visit, the Short-Form 12 Health Survey (SF-12), the Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS2), and the Revised Danger Assessment (DA), administered by interview at 1 week follow-up.
Results: In total, 548 (20%) participants screened disclosed IPV victimization. Of those, 216 (40%) completed the follow-up assessment 1 week later. This cohort was 91% African American, 70% single, and 63% female, with a mean age of 35 (SD 10.41). Both physical and mental health functioning scores were lower than normative levels (50) compared with national averages: Physical Component Summary (PCS) scale 43.64 (SD 10.86) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scale 37.46 (SD 12.29). As physical assault, psychological aggression, and reported injury increased on the CTS2, mental health functioning diminished (p < 0.01). Increased physical assault and psychological aggression were also associated with diminished physical health functioning (p < 0.05). As victim-perceived danger increased on the DA, both physical and mental health functioning decreased (p < 0.01, p < 0.001, respectively). Greater self-advocacy activities were associated with lower mental (but not physical) health functioning as well. Females experienced worsening mental health functioning as both physical assault and psychological aggression increased, whereas male victims experienced worsening mental health functioning only as psychological aggression increased.
Conclusions: These findings suggest that IPV takes a greater mental than physical toll (for both sexes) and that as IPV severity increases, mental health functioning diminishes and self-advocacy behaviors increase. Additionally, as perceived danger increases, both physical and mental health status worsens. This has important implications for clinicians to assess and consider IPV victims' perceptions of their situations relative to danger, not just the levels of abuse they are experiencing.
References
-
- Alpert EJ. Violence in intimate relationships and the practicing internist: New “disease” or new agenda? Ann Intern Med. 1995;123:774–781. - PubMed
-
- Plichta SB. Intimate partner violence and physical health consequences: Policy and practice implications. J Interpers Violence. 2004;19:1296–1323. - PubMed
-
- Campbell JC. Health consequences of intimate partner violence. Lancet. 2002;359:1331–1336. - PubMed
-
- McFarlane JM. Groff JY. O'Brien JA. Watson K. Prevalence of partner violence against 7,443 African American, white, and Hispanic women receiving care at urban public primary care clinics. Public Health Nurs. 2005;22:98–107. - PubMed
-
- West CM. Black women and intimate partner violence: New directions for research. J Interpers Violence. 2004;19:1487–1493. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials