Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Aug 24;202(1):11-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.03.007. Epub 2009 Mar 19.

The contribution of the central nucleus of the amygdala to individual differences in amphetamine-induced hyperactivity

Affiliations

The contribution of the central nucleus of the amygdala to individual differences in amphetamine-induced hyperactivity

Mary E Cain et al. Behav Brain Res. .

Abstract

Rats classified as high responders (HR) based on their response to an inescapable novel environment self-administer more amphetamine and have greater amphetamine-induced sensitization than rats classified as low responders (LR). Recent research suggests that the central nucleus of the amygdala (ACe) contributes to the elevated self-administration in HR rats. Therefore, the current study examined the role of the ACe in the expression of both amphetamine-induced sensitization and conditioned hyperactivity in HR and LR rats. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were screened for their response to inescapable novelty and classified as HR or LR rats. Rats were implanted with bilateral cannulae into the ACe and received amphetamine (1.0 mg/kg, s.c.) or saline injections immediately prior to 1-h locomotor sessions. Following five training sessions, all rats received an infusion of muscimol (0.5 microg/0.5 microl) or phosphate buffered saline (PBS) followed by a saline injection to measure conditioned hyperactivity. HR rats displayed conditioned hyperactivity, while LR rats did not, suggesting that HR and LR rats differ in the expression of conditioned hyperactivity. While ACe inactivation attenuated the expression of conditioned hyperactivity, it did not differentially affect HR and LR rats. Following additional training and a 10-day rest period, all rats were then tested for amphetamine-induced sensitization (1.0 mg/kg) following an infusion of muscimol or PBS. Inactivation of the ACe attenuated the expression of sensitization only in HR rats. These results suggest the ACe contributes to the greater amphetamine sensitization in HR rats.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure/Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that this work was funded by USPHS grant DA021359 and Kansas State University. We declare that, except for income received from our primary employers, no financial support or compensation has been received from any individual or corporate entity over the past three years for research or professional service and there are no personal financial holdings that could be perceived as constituting a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Shaded regions indicate the location of cannulae placements as verified by thionin-stained sections for HR (formula image) and LR (formula image) rats. The shaded regions represent the most ventral point of the injector tracts on coronal sections based on the atlas of Paxinos and Watson (1998). Numbers indicate the distance from Bregma in millimeters.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Figure 2A & B: The mean (± S.E.M.) total distance traveled (cm) for rats in the Paired, Unpaired and Control groups during sessions 1–5 of acquisition training. (A): HR and LR groups. (B) HNS and LNS groups. Asterisks (*) indicate a significant difference (p<.001) in Paired groups relative to Unpaired and Control groups. Numerical signs (#) indicate a significant difference (p<.05) between HR and LR rats.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The mean (± S.E.M.) total distance traveled (cm) for rats in the Paired, Unpaired and Control groups during the conditioned-hyperactivity test. Asterisks (*) indicate a significant difference (p<.01) in Paired groups relative to Unpaired and Control groups. Numerical signs (#) indicate a significant difference (p<.01) between Muscimol treatment groups relative to PBS treatment groups.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Figure 4A & B: The mean (± S.E.M.) total distance traveled (cm) for HR and LR rats in the Paired, Unpaired and Control groups during the conditioned-hyperactivity test. (A): HR rats treated with PBS and muscimol. (B). LR rats treated with PBS and muscimol. Asterisks (*) indicate a significant difference (p<.01) from the Paired groups. Numerical signs (#) indicate a significant difference (p<.001) between PBS and muscimol treatment groups.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The mean (± S.E.M.) total distance traveled (cm) for HR and LR rats in the Paired, Unpaired and Control groups during sessions 1–5 of sensitization training. Asterisks (*) indicate a significant difference (p<.001) in Paired groups relative to Unpaired and Control groups. Numerical sign (#) indicates a significant difference (p<.05) between HR and LR rats.
Figure 6
Figure 6
The mean (± S.E.M.) total distance traveled (cm) for rats in the Paired, Unpaired and Control groups during the sensitization test. Asterisks (*) indicate a significant difference (p<.01) in Paired groups relative to Unpaired and Control groups.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Figure 7A & B: The mean (± S.E.M.) total distance traveled (cm) for HR and LR rats in the Paired, Unpaired and Control groups during the sensitization test. (A): HR rats treated with PBS and muscimol. (B). LR rats treated with PBS and muscimol. Asterisks (*) indicate a significant difference (p<.01) from Control groups. Numerical signs (#) indicate a significant difference (p<.05) between PBS and muscimol treatment groups.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alheid GF, Heimer L. New prespectives in basal forebrain organization of special relevance for neuropsychiatric disorders: The striatopallidal, amygdaloid, and corticopetal components of the substantia innominata. Neuroscience. 1988;27:1–39. - PubMed
    1. Alleweireldt AT, Hobbs RJ, Taylor AR, Neisewander JL. Effects of SCH-23390 infused into the amygdala or adjacent cortex and basal ganglia on cocaine seeking and self-administration in rats. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2006;31:363–374. - PubMed
    1. Bardo MT, Bevins RA. Conditioned place preference: what does it add to our preclinical understanding of drug reward? Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2000;153:31–43. - PubMed
    1. Beaulieu S, DiPaolo T, Barden N. Control of ACTH secretion by the central nucleus of the amygdala: Implication of the serotonergic system and its relevance to the glucocorticoid delayed feedback mechanism. Neuroendocrinology. 1986;44:247–254. - PubMed
    1. Belin D, Mar AC, Dalley JW, Robbins TW, Everitt BJ. High impulsivity predicts the switch to compulsive cocaine-taking. Science. 2008;320:1352–1355. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types