Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jun;6(6):423-30.
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1333.

A HUPO test sample study reveals common problems in mass spectrometry-based proteomics

Collaborators, Affiliations

A HUPO test sample study reveals common problems in mass spectrometry-based proteomics

Alexander W Bell et al. Nat Methods. 2009 Jun.

Abstract

We performed a test sample study to try to identify errors leading to irreproducibility, including incompleteness of peptide sampling, in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based proteomics. We distributed an equimolar test sample, comprising 20 highly purified recombinant human proteins, to 27 laboratories. Each protein contained one or more unique tryptic peptides of 1,250 Da to test for ion selection and sampling in the mass spectrometer. Of the 27 labs, members of only 7 labs initially reported all 20 proteins correctly, and members of only 1 lab reported all tryptic peptides of 1,250 Da. Centralized analysis of the raw data, however, revealed that all 20 proteins and most of the 1,250 Da peptides had been detected in all 27 labs. Our centralized analysis determined missed identifications (false negatives), environmental contamination, database matching and curation of protein identifications as sources of problems. Improved search engines and databases are needed for mass spectrometry-based proteomics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Number of tandem mass spectra assigned to tryptic peptides
(a) Comparison of protein abundances (% total redundant peptides) from the centralized analysis of the raw data collected from the 27 labs (left side) and (right side) after removal of individual lab contaminants including keratins as well as trypsin. (b) Peptide heat map representation for each of the 20 proteins (gene symbol) from the centralized analysis of the raw data from all 27 labs, revealing the frequency of observation of a given peptide as well as its position in the protein sequence. Blue, the 1250 Da peptides; red, all other tryptic peptides.. Raw data from lab 24 was excluded (see Online Methods). Scale bar represents the number of redundant peptides. Scale bar is linear from 1 to 500 peptides.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Discrepancies between reported data and centralized analysis identify erroneous reporting
Peptide heat map comparisons of the centralized analysis compiled for all 27 labs (Total), with the data from selected individual labs indicated below for the proteins (a) ATPAF2, (b) SETD3 and (c) F2. Blue, the 1250 Da peptides; red, all other tryptic peptides. Scale bar represents the number of redundant peptides. Missed cleavages account for the different degree of shading for peptides of mass 1250 Da.

Comment in

References

    1. de Godoy LM, et al. Comprehensive mass-spectrometry-based proteome quantification of haploid versus diploid yeast. Nature. 2008;455:1251–4. - PubMed
    1. Turck CW, et al. The Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities Proteomics Research Group 2006 study: relative protein quantitation. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 2007;6:1291–8. - PubMed
    1. Boutilier K, et al. Comparison of different search engines using validated MS/MS test datasets. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2005;534:11–20.
    1. Elias JE, Haas W, Faherty BK, Gygi SP. Comparative evaluation of mass spectrometry platforms used in large-scale proteomics investigations. Nat. Methods. 2005;2:667–75. - PubMed
    1. Kapp EA, et al. An evaluation, comparison, and accurate benchmarking of several publicly available MS/MS search algorithms: sensitivity and specificity analysis. Proteomics. 2005;5:3475–90. - PubMed

Publication types