Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2010 Mar;42(1):81-8.
doi: 10.1007/s11255-009-9580-7. Epub 2009 May 16.

Neoadjuvant LHRH analog plus estramustine phosphate combined with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer: a randomized study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Neoadjuvant LHRH analog plus estramustine phosphate combined with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer: a randomized study

Daisaku Hirano et al. Int Urol Nephrol. 2010 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of a treatment regimen comprising neoadjuvant conventional androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plus estramustine phosphate (EMP) combined with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) for patients with intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer.

Methods: Thirty-nine patients with intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer classified according to the NCCN practice guidelines recurrence risk group were randomly allocated into two groups: neoadjuvant LHRH agonist plus EMP for 6 months until completion of the 3D-CRT (EMP group, n = 20), or neoadjuvant LHRH agonist alone (LHRH group, n = 19). Both groups received 3D-CRT in daily fractions of 2 Gy for a total dose of 70 Gy. PSA relapse was defined according to the Phoenix definition.

Results: The median duration of follow-up was 27.1 months. None of the patients died during the follow-up period, but three patients in the LHRH group developed distant metastasis. The 4-year PSA relapse-free survival outcomes for the EMP group and LHRH group were 61.2 and 49.4%, respectively (P = 0.04). Multivariate Cox regression model analyses of the pretreatment PSA level (>20 ng/ml n = 16 vs. < or =20 ng/ml n = 23), grade (G8 or more n = 11 vs. G7 or less n = 28) and modality (LHRH group n = 19 vs. EMP group n = 20) revealed these factors to be independent predictors of PSA relapse after treatment: pretreatment PSA had a relative risk of 3.84 (95% CI: 1.003-14.722), grade had a relative risk of 4.29 (95% CI: 1.093-16.824), and modality had a relative risk of 8.01 (95% CI: 1.867-34.361). No severe toxicities were observed in either group.

Conclusions: The present results indicate that the combination of neoadjuvant ADT plus EMP combined with 3D-CRT sustains freedom from PSA relapse in patients with intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer. However, this regimen is insufficient for preventing biochemical failure, and an additional intervention such as adjuvant ADT, radiation dose escalation, or both, is required, especially for patients with a pretreatment PSA level of more than 20 ng/ml and high-grade cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Semin Oncol. 1983 Sep;10(3 Suppl 3):46-7 - PubMed
    1. J Cell Biol. 1988 Dec;107(6 Pt 2):2647-56 - PubMed
    1. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Jul 15;65(4):965-74 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Oncol. 2000 May;18(9):1936-41 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Oncol. 2006 May 1;24(13):1990-6 - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources