Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 May;19(5):490-9.
doi: 10.1002/pon.1579.

How oncologists and their patients with advanced cancer communicate about health-related quality of life

Keri L Rodriguez  1 , Nichole Bayliss, Stewart C Alexander, Amy S Jeffreys, Maren K Olsen, Kathryn I Pollak, Sarah L Kennifer, James A Tulsky, Robert M Arnold
Affiliations

How oncologists and their patients with advanced cancer communicate about health-related quality of life

Keri L Rodriguez et al. Psychooncology. 2010 May.

Abstract

Objective: To describe the content and frequency of communication about health-related quality of life (HRQOL) during outpatient encounters between oncologists and their patients with advanced cancer.

Methods: We coded for HRQOL talk in a subset of audio-recorded conversations (each previously found to contain prognostic talk by the oncologist) from the Study of Communication in Oncologist-Patient Encounters Trial, a randomized controlled trial conducted from 2003 to 2008 in two large US academic medical centers and one Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

Results: Seventy-three encounters involved 70 patients and 37 oncologists. Patients were more likely to be female (53%), White (86%), married (78%), and possessing some college education (62%). Most oncologists were male (78%) and White (78%). Mean ages were 59 years for patients and 44 years for oncologists. Every encounter included some talk about HRQOL and HRQOL discussions made up, on average, 25% of the visit time. HRQOL segments described symptoms (50%), general HRQOL (27%), and the following concerns: physical (27%), functional (22%), psychological (9%), social (7%), spiritual (1%), and other (28%). Topics included treatment (56%), disease (14%), and testing (3%), and conversations focused on past (44%), present (68%), and future HRQOL (59%).

Conclusions: HRQOL discussions between oncologists and patients are common, but the emphasis is often on treatment (e.g. side effects) and symptoms (e.g. pain) even in patients with advanced disease. Given the often intense emotional experience of patients with advanced cancer, oncologists may need to pay more attention to psychological, social, and spiritual HRQOL concerns.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: All manuscript authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest (i.e., financial and personal relationships between themselves and others that might bias their work).

References

    1. McCarthy EP, Phillips RS, Zhong Z, et al. Dying with cancer: patients’ function, symptoms, and care preferences as death approaches. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48:S110–S121. - PubMed
    1. Bergner M. Quality of life, health status, and clinical research. Med Care. 1989;27:S148–S156. - PubMed
    1. Cella DF. Quality of life: concepts and definition. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1994;9:186–192. - PubMed
    1. Mast ME. Definition and measurement of quality of life in oncology nursing research: review and theoretical implications. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1995;22:957–964. - PubMed
    1. Cella DF, Patel JD. Improving health-related quality of life in non-small-cell lung cancer with current treatment options. Clin Lung Cancer. 2008;9:206–212. - PubMed

Publication types