Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Dec;42(4):149-55.

What are the Technical and Allocative Efficiencies of Public Health Centres in Ghana?

J Akazili  1 , M Adjuik, S Chatio, E Kanyomse, A Hodgson, M Aikins, J Gyapong
Affiliations

What are the Technical and Allocative Efficiencies of Public Health Centres in Ghana?

J Akazili et al. Ghana Med J. 2008 Dec.

Abstract

Introduction: Health systems in developing countries including Ghana are faced with critical resource constraints in pursuing the goal of improving the health status of the population. The constrained ability to adequately meet health care needs is exacerbated by inefficiency in the health care systems, especially within public health centres.

Methods: The study used Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) method, to calculate the technical and allocative efficiency of 113 randomly sampled health centres. A logistic regression model was also applied on whether a health centre was technically efficient or not to determine the factors that significantly influence the efficiency of health centres.

Findings: The findings showed that 78% of health centres were technically inefficient and so were using resources that they did not actually need. Eight-eight percent were also allocatively inefficient. The overall efficiency, (product of the technical and allocative efficiency), was also calculated and over 90% of the health centres were inefficient. The results of a logistic regression analysis show that newer health centres and those which receive incentives were more likely to be technically efficient compared to older health centres and those who did receive incentives.

Conclusion: The results broadly point to grave inefficiency in the health care delivery system of the health centres and that lots of resources could be saved if measures were put in place to curb the waste. Incentives to health centres were found to be major motivating factors to the promotion of efficiency.

Keywords: Allocative efficiency; Ghana; Health Centres; Resource allocation; Technical efficiency.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Summary of technical, allocative and overall efficiencies of public health centres in Ghana
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Leighton C, Makinen M. Health Sector Reforms in Sub-Saharan Africa; Paper presented in a Workshop; 1999; Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
    1. Kirigia JM, Emrouznejad A, Sambo LG, Munguti N, Liambila W. Using Data Envelopment Analysis to measure the technical efficiency of public health centres in Kenya. Journal of Medical Systems. 2004;28(2):155–166. - PubMed
    1. Kirigia JM, Emrouznejad A, Sambo LG. Measurement of technical efficiency of public hospitals in Kenya Using Data Envelopment Analysis 2002. Journal of Medical Systems. 2002;26(1):39–45. - PubMed
    1. World Bank, author. The Millenium Development Goals for Health: Rising to the Challenges. Washington DC: World Bank; 2004.
    1. WHO, author. The role of Health Centres in the Development of Urban Health Systems. Geneva: 1992. (Technical Report Series 827) - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources