Differences between selection on sex versus recombination in red queen models with diploid hosts
- PMID: 19453733
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00695.x
Differences between selection on sex versus recombination in red queen models with diploid hosts
Abstract
The Red Queen hypothesis argues that parasites generate selection for genetic mixing (sex and recombination) in their hosts. A number of recent papers have examined this hypothesis using models with haploid hosts. In these haploid models, sex and recombination are selectively equivalent. However, sex and recombination are not equivalent in diploids because selection on sex depends on the consequences of segregation as well as recombination. Here I compare how parasites select on modifiers of sexual reproduction and modifiers of recombination rate. Across a wide set of parameters, parasites tend to select against both sex and recombination, though recombination is favored more often than is sex. There is little correspondence between the conditions favoring sex and those favoring recombination, indicating that the direction of selection on sex is often determined by the effects of segregation, not recombination. Moreover, when sex was favored it is usually due to a long-term advantage whereas short-term effects are often responsible for selection favoring recombination. These results strongly indicate that Red Queen models focusing exclusively on the effects of recombination cannot be used to infer the type of selection on sex that is generated by parasites on diploid hosts.
Similar articles
-
Host-parasite coevolution and selection on sex through the effects of segregation.Am Nat. 2006 Nov;168(5):617-29. doi: 10.1086/508029. Epub 2006 Sep 20. Am Nat. 2006. PMID: 17080361
-
Rapid parasite adaptation drives selection for high recombination rates.Evolution. 2008 Feb;62(2):295-300. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00265.x. Epub 2007 Nov 26. Evolution. 2008. PMID: 18039325
-
Spatial heterogeneity and the evolution of sex in diploids.Am Nat. 2009 Jul;174 Suppl 1:S54-70. doi: 10.1086/599082. Am Nat. 2009. PMID: 19456268
-
A review of Red Queen models for the persistence of obligate sexual reproduction.J Hered. 2010 Mar-Apr;101 Suppl 1:S13-20. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esq010. J Hered. 2010. PMID: 20421322 Review.
-
Evolution of sex: why do organisms shuffle their genotypes?Curr Biol. 2006 Sep 5;16(17):R696-704. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.07.063. Curr Biol. 2006. PMID: 16950096 Review.
Cited by
-
Evolutionary biology: Infection elevates diversity.Nature. 2015 Sep 24;525(7570):464-5. doi: 10.1038/525464a. Nature. 2015. PMID: 26399826 No abstract available.
-
Higher rates of sex evolve in spatially heterogeneous environments.Nature. 2010 Nov 4;468(7320):89-92. doi: 10.1038/nature09449. Epub 2010 Oct 13. Nature. 2010. PMID: 20944628
-
Plant sex and the evolution of plant defenses against herbivores.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Oct 27;106(43):18079-84. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0904695106. Epub 2009 Jul 15. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009. PMID: 19617572 Free PMC article.
-
Influences of dominance and evolution of sex in finite diploid populations.PLoS One. 2015 May 26;10(5):e0128459. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128459. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26011082 Free PMC article.
-
Antagonistic experimental coevolution with a parasite increases host recombination frequency.BMC Evol Biol. 2012 Feb 13;12:18. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-12-18. BMC Evol Biol. 2012. PMID: 22330615 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources