Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 Jul;36(7):445-51.
doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181a2aa95.

Missed and delayed syphilis treatment and partner elicitation: a comparison between STD clinic and non-STD clinic patients

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Missed and delayed syphilis treatment and partner elicitation: a comparison between STD clinic and non-STD clinic patients

Sanny Y Chen et al. Sex Transm Dis. 2009 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Because of increases in reported syphilis, we sought to identify factors associated with missed and delayed syphilis treatment and partner elicitation interview.

Methods: We reviewed syphilis cases reported during June 1, 2006 to May 31, 2007 and conducted multivariate logistic regression analyses to determine demographic and clinical predictors of missed and delayed syphilis treatment and partner elicitation interview.

Results: Of 638 syphilis cases, 38 (6%) were identified as untreated cases. Median time-to-treatment was 7 days (range: 0-380) and median time-to-partner elicitation interview was 14 days (range: 0-380 days) for all case-patients. Both intervals were shorter for patients among whom syphilis was diagnosed at the STD clinic versus non-STD facilities. In multivariate analysis, diagnosis at a non-STD clinic (AOR: 2.6; 95% CI, 1.0-6.9) and having a late infection of unknown duration (AOR: 2.1; 95% CI, 1.0-4.6) were significantly associated with untreated syphilis.

Conclusion: Time-to-treatment and time-to-partner elicitation interview were shorter for patients among whom syphilis was diagnosed at the STD clinic. For non-STD settings in Maricopa County, improvements in quality of care (i.e., timely treatment) and expeditious public health interventions (i.e., partner elicitation interview) are needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Trends in Reportable Sex Transm Dis in the United States, 2006—National Surveillance Data for Chlamydia, Gonorrhea, and Syphilis, November 2007. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats/syphilis.htm. Accessed May 30, 2008.
    1. Maricopa Department of Public Health. Statistics and Reports. Available at: http://www.maricopa.gov/Public_Health/ControlPrevention/STDs/Syphilis.aspx. Accessed May 30, 2008.
    1. Arizona Department of Health Services. 2007 STD Annual Report. Available at: http://www.azdhs.gov/phs/oids/std/pdf/Arizona%20STD%20Annual%20Report%20.... Accessed December 16, 2008.
    1. Martin D, Bertrand JR, McKegney CP, et al. Congenital syphilis surveillance and newborn evaluation in a low incidence state. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2001; 155:140–144. - PubMed
    1. Wong D, Berman SM, Furness BW, et al. Time to treatment for women with chlamydia or gonococcal infections: a comparative evaluation of sexually transmitted disease clinics in 3 US cities. Sex Transm Dis 2005; 32:194–198. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms