Treatment of nonmuscle invading bladder cancer: do physicians in the United States practice evidence based medicine? The use and economic implications of intravesical chemotherapy after transurethral resection of bladder tumors
- PMID: 19455607
- PMCID: PMC2769205
- DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24311
Treatment of nonmuscle invading bladder cancer: do physicians in the United States practice evidence based medicine? The use and economic implications of intravesical chemotherapy after transurethral resection of bladder tumors
Abstract
Background: Phase 3 clinical trials performed primarily outside the US demonstrate that intravesical instillation of chemotherapy immediately after transurethral resection of the bladder (TURB) decreases cancer recurrence rates. The authors sought to determine whether US urologists have adopted this practice, and its potential effect on costs of bladder cancer (BC) care.
Methods: By using 1997-2004 MEDSTAT claims data, the authors identified patients with newly diagnosed BC who underwent cystoscopic biopsy or TURB, and those who received intravesical chemotherapy within 1 day after TURB. Economic consequences of this treatment compared with TURB alone were modeled using published efficacy estimates and Medicare reimbursements. The authors used a time horizon of 3 years and assumed that this treatment was given for all newly diagnosed low-risk BC patients.
Results: Between 1997 and 2004, the authors identified 16,748 patients with newly diagnosed BC, of whom 14,677 underwent cystoscopic biopsy or TURB. Of these, only 49 (0.33%) received same-day intravesical instillation of chemotherapy. From 1997 through 2004, there has been little change in the use of this treatment. The authors estimated a 3-year savings of $538 to $690 (10% to 12%) per patient treated with TURB and immediate intravesical chemotherapy compared with TURB alone, reflecting a yearly national savings of $19.8 to $24.8 million.
Conclusions: Instillation of intravesical chemotherapy immediately after TURB has not been embraced in the US. Adopting this policy would significantly lower the cost of BC care.
(c) 2009 American Cancer Society.
Figures
Comment in
-
When medical evidence alone is simply not enough.Cancer. 2009 Jun 15;115(12):2602-4. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24312. Cancer. 2009. PMID: 19382190 No abstract available.
-
Words of wisdom. Re: treatment of non-muscle invading bladder cancer: do physicians in the United States practice evidence based medicine?Eur Urol. 2010 Apr;57(4):730-1. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.01.031. Eur Urol. 2010. PMID: 20965045 No abstract available.
References
-
- Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Smigal C, et al. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006;56:106–30. - PubMed
-
- Madeb R, Messing EM. Gender, racial and age differences in bladder cancer incidence and mortality. Urol Oncol. 2004;22:86–92. - PubMed
-
- Messing EM. Urothelial tumors of the urinary tract. In: Walsh PC, et al., editors. Campbell’s Urology. 4. Vol. 8. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2002. pp. 2732–2784.
-
- Klan R, Loy V, Huland H. Residual tumor discovered in routine second transurethral resection in patients with stage T1 transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. J Urol. 1991;146:316–8. - PubMed
-
- Solsona E, Iborra I, Ricos JV, Monros JL, Casanova J, Dumont R. Effectiveness of a single immediate mitomycin C instillation in patients with low risk superficial bladder cancer: short and long-term followup. J Urol. 1999;161:1120–3. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
