Attentionally splitting the mass distribution of hand-held rods
- PMID: 1945735
- DOI: 10.3758/bf03212214
Attentionally splitting the mass distribution of hand-held rods
Abstract
Two experiments on the length-perception capabilities of effortful or dynamic touch differed only in terms of what the subject intended to perceive, while experimental conditions and apparatus were held constant. In each trial, a visually occluded rod was held as still as possible by the subject at an intermediate position. For two thirds of the trials, a weight was attached to the rod above or below the hand. In Experiment 1, in which the subject's task was to perceive the distance reachable with the portion of the rod forward of the hand, perceived extent was a function of the first moment of the mass distribution associated with the forward portion of the rod, and indifferent to the first moment of the entire rod. In Experiment 2, in which the task was to perceive the distance reachable with the entire rod if it was held at an end, the pattern of results was reversed. These results indicate the capability of selective sensitivity to different aspects of a hand-held object's mass distribution, without the possibility of differential exploration specific to these two tasks. Results are discussed in relation to possible roles of differential information, intention, and self-organization in the explanations of selective perceptual abilities.
Similar articles
-
Haptic perception of partial-rod lengths with the rod held stationary or wielded.Percept Psychophys. 1994 May;55(5):551-61. doi: 10.3758/bf03205312. Percept Psychophys. 1994. PMID: 8008556
-
Perceiving extents of rods by wielding: haptic diagonalization and decomposition of the inertia tensor.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1989 Feb;15(1):58-68. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.15.1.58. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1989. PMID: 2522533
-
Haptically perceiving the distances reachable with hand-held objects.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1988 Aug;14(3):404-27. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.14.3.404. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1988. PMID: 2971770
-
Dynamic touch.Am Psychol. 1996 Nov;51(11):1134-52. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.51.11.1134. Am Psychol. 1996. PMID: 8937263 Review.
-
Assume a Spherical Chicken: Analytic Constraints, Inertia Tensor Information, and Wielded Rod Length Perception.J Mot Behav. 2019;51(6):698-714. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2019.1565527. Epub 2019 Feb 4. J Mot Behav. 2019. PMID: 30714509 Review.
Cited by
-
Exteroception and exproprioception by dynamic touch are different functions of the inertia tensor.Percept Psychophys. 1996 Nov;58(8):1191-202. doi: 10.3758/bf03207552. Percept Psychophys. 1996. PMID: 8961830
-
Haptic probing: perceiving the length of a probe and the distance of a surface probed.Percept Psychophys. 1992 Jun;51(6):580-98. doi: 10.3758/bf03211655. Percept Psychophys. 1992. PMID: 1620570
-
The effect of density and diameter on haptic perception of rod length.Percept Psychophys. 1995 Aug;57(6):778-86. doi: 10.3758/bf03206793. Percept Psychophys. 1995. PMID: 7651802
-
Fractal fluctuations in exploratory movements predict differences in dynamic touch capabilities between children with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and typical development.PLoS One. 2019 May 21;14(5):e0217200. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217200. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31112590 Free PMC article.
-
Haptic perception of partial-rod lengths with the rod held stationary or wielded.Percept Psychophys. 1994 May;55(5):551-61. doi: 10.3758/bf03205312. Percept Psychophys. 1994. PMID: 8008556