Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 Jun;192(6):1662-7.
doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.1872.

Whole-chest 64-MDCT of emergency department patients with nonspecific chest pain: Radiation dose and coronary artery image quality with prospective ECG triggering versus retrospective ECG gating

William P Shuman  1 , Kelley R Branch, Janet M May, Lee M Mitsumori, Jared N Strote, Bill H Warren, Theodore J Dubinsky, David W Lockhart, James H Caldwell
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Whole-chest 64-MDCT of emergency department patients with nonspecific chest pain: Radiation dose and coronary artery image quality with prospective ECG triggering versus retrospective ECG gating

William P Shuman et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the patient radiation dose and coronary artery image quality of long-z-axis whole-chest 64-MDCT performed with retrospective ECG gating with those of CT performed with prospective ECG triggering in the evaluation of emergency department patients with nonspecific chest pain.

Subjects and methods: Consecutively registered emergency department patients with nonspecific low-to-moderate-risk chest pain underwent whole-chest CT with retrospective gating (n = 41) or prospective triggering (n = 31). Effective patient radiation doses were estimated and compared by use of unpaired Student's t tests. Two reviewers independently scored the quality of images of the coronary arteries, and the scores were compared by use of ordinal logistic regression.

Results: Age, heart rate, body mass index, and z-axis coverage were not statistically different between the two groups. For retrospective gating, the mean effective radiation dose was 31.8 +/- 5.1 mSv; for prospective triggering, the mean effective radiation dose was 9.2 +/- 2.2 mSv (prospective triggering 71% lower, p < 0.001). Two of 512 segments imaged with retrospective gating were nonevaluable (0.4%), and two of 394 segments imaged with prospective triggering were nonevaluable (0.5%). Prospectively triggered images were 2.2 (95% CI, 1.1-4.5) times as likely as retrospectively gated images to receive a high image quality score for each segment after adjustment for segment differences (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: For long-z-axis whole-chest 64-MDCT of emergency department patients with nonspecific chest pain, use of prospective ECG triggering may result in substantially lower patient radiation doses and better coronary artery image quality than is achieved with retrospective ECG gating.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
47-year-old man with nonspecific chest pains. Prospectively triggered CT image of right coronary artery with image quality score of 3: motion artifact or noise-related blurring, fair vessel opacification, minimal structural discontinuity.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
54-year-old man with nonspecific chest pains. Prospectively triggered CT image of right coronary artery with image quality score of 2: minor motion artifact or noise-related blurring, good vessel opacification, and no structural discontinuity.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
49-year-old man with nonspecific chest pains. Prospectively triggered CT image of right coronary artery with image quality score of 1: absence of motion artifact and noise-related blurring, excellent vessel opacification, and no structural discontinuity.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Hayter RG, Rhea JT, Small A, Tafazoli FS, Novel-line RA. Suspected aortic dissection and other aortic disorders: multi-detector row CT in 373 cases in the emergency setting. Radiology. 2006;238:841–852. - PubMed
    1. Gallagher MJ, Ross MA, Raff GL, Goldstein JA, O'Neill WW, O'Neil B. The diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography compared with stress nuclear imaging in emergency department low-risk chest pain patients. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;49:125–136. - PubMed
    1. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A, et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J. 2005;26:1482–1487. - PubMed
    1. Hoffmann U, Nagurney JT, Moselewski F, et al. Coronary multidetector computed tomography in the assessment of patients with acute chest pain. Circulation. 2006;114:2251–2260. - PubMed
    1. Rubinshtein R, Halon DA, Gaspar T, et al. Usefulness of 64-slice cardiac computed tomographic angiography for diagnosing acute coronary syndromes and predicting clinical outcome in emergency department patients with chest pain of uncertain origin. Circulation. 2007;115:1762–1768. - PubMed

Publication types