Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 May 21;4(5):e5648.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005648.

Patterns and distribution of HIV among adult men and women in India

Affiliations

Patterns and distribution of HIV among adult men and women in India

Jessica M Perkins et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: While the estimated prevalence of HIV in India experienced a downward revision in 2007, the patterning and distribution of HIV in the population remains unclear. We examined the individual and state-level socioeconomic patterning of individual HIV status among adult men and women in India as well as the patterning of other individual demographic and behavioral determinants of HIV status.

Methodology/principal findings: We conducted logistic regression models accounting for the survey design using nationally representative, cross-sectional data on 100,030 women and men from the 2005-2006 India National Family Health survey which, for the first time, provided objective assessments of HIV seroprevalence. Although there was a weak relationship between household wealth and risk of being HIV-positive, there was a clear negative relationship between individual education attainment and risk of being HIV-positive among both men and women. A 1000 Rupee change in the per capita net state domestic product was associated with a 4% and 5% increase in the risk for positive HIV status among men and women, respectively. State-level income inequality was associated with increased risk of HIV for men. Marital status and selected sexual behavior indicators were significant predictors of HIV status among women whereas the age effect was the most dominant predictor of HIV infection among men.

Conclusions/significance: Although the prevalence of HIV in India is low, the lack of strong wealth patterning in the risk of HIV suggests a more generalized distribution of HIV risk than some of India's high-risk group HIV prevention policies have assumed. The positive association between state economic development and individual risk for HIV is intriguing and requires further scrutiny.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Joint United Nations Program on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) WHOW. AIDS Epidemic Update: December 2007. 2007. UNAIDS. 978 92 9 173621 B 978 92 9 173621 B.
    1. Joint United Nations Program on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) WHOW. AIDS Epidemic Update: December 2006. 2006. UNAIDS.
    1. International IIfPSIaM. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005–2006: India: Volumes I and II. Mumbai: IIPS; 2007.
    1. National Institute of Health & Family Welfare (NIHFW) NACON. Annual HIV Sentinel Surveillance Country Report 2006. New Delhi, India: NIHFW, NACO; 2007.
    1. Dandona L, Lakshmi V, Kumar GA, Dandona R. Is the HIV burden in India being overestimated? BMC Public Health. 2006;6:308. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types