Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Mar;34(3):437-40.
doi: 10.1007/s00264-009-0806-1. Epub 2009 May 22.

Comparative study of the use of electromagnetic fields in patients with pseudoarthrosis of tibia treated by intramedullary nailing

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparative study of the use of electromagnetic fields in patients with pseudoarthrosis of tibia treated by intramedullary nailing

Juan L Cebrián et al. Int Orthop. 2010 Mar.

Abstract

We made a comparative cohort study in patients suffering from tibial pseudoarthrosis, all of whom were treated by intramedullary nailing. We divided patients into two groups: one treated by intramedullary nailing only (control group) and the other by intramedullary nailing combined with pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMFs). The study included 57 cases of tibial pseudoarthrosis in 57 patients from February 1987 to February 2002. Pseudoarthrosis was treated surgically in all cases (Grosse-Kempf dynamic intramedullary nailing). This was combined with PEMFs in 22 cases. The average age was 38.3 years (range 14-89 years) and the average duration of follow-up was 27.2 months (range 12-48 months). Forty-nine fractures (86%) healed and eight (14%) did not. Of the group treated with PEMFs, 20 (91%) healed and two (9%) did not; from the group that did not receive PEMF (35), 29 (83%) healed compared to six (17%) that did not. The relationship between union and use of PEMFs, and between time to union and use of PEMFs was clinically relevant. PEMFs are useful when treating tibial pseudoarthrosis. Its noninvasive nature means that there are more complication-free unions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aaron RK, Ciombor DMcK, Simon BJ. Treatment of nonunions with electric and electromagnetic fields. Clin Orthop. 2004;419:21–29. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200402000-00005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aaron RK, Ciombor DMcK, Simon BJ. Stimulation of growth factor synthesis by electric and electromagnetic fields. Clin Orthop. 2004;419:30–37. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200402000-00006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adair RK. Biological effects on the cellular level of electric field pulses. Health Phys. 1991;61:395–399. - PubMed
    1. Anderson JC, Erikson C. Piezoelectric properties of dry and wet bone. Nature. 1970;227:491–492. doi: 10.1038/227491a0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bassett CAL, Valdés MG, Hernandez E. Modification of fracture repair with selected pulsing electromagnetic fields. J Bone Jt Surg. 1982;64-A:888. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms