Outcomes and complications with off-label use of drug-eluting stents: results from the STENT (Strategic Transcatheter Evaluation of New Therapies) group
- PMID: 19463338
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.06.005
Outcomes and complications with off-label use of drug-eluting stents: results from the STENT (Strategic Transcatheter Evaluation of New Therapies) group
Erratum in
- JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Oct;1(5):601
Abstract
Objectives: This study evaluates outcomes and complications in patients treated with drug-eluting stents (DES) for "off-label" indications.
Background: Drug-eluting stents have been effective in randomized trials, but their safety and efficacy for off-label indications has not been well studied.
Methods: The STENT (Strategic Transcatheter Evaluation of New Therapies) Registry is the largest multicenter U.S. registry evaluating outcomes of DES. Off-label indications included ostial, left main, long, bifurcation, and in-stent restenotic lesions, saphenous vein grafts, chronic total occlusions, small or large vessels, multilesion or multivessel percutaneous coronary interventions, and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Outcomes were adjusted using Cox proportional hazards regression and propensity analyses.
Results: Drug-eluting stents were used in an off-label manner in 59% of patients. The patients who received off-label treatment were more often male, had a higher incidence of prior infarction and bypass surgery, and lower ejection fractions. Off-label versus "on-label" use of DES was associated with higher rates of death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, major adverse cardiac events, and stent thrombosis at 9 months and 2 years. Off-label use of DES compared with off-label use of bare-metal stents (BMS) had lower rates of death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, and major adverse cardiac events at 9 months and 2 years and lower rates of stent thrombosis at 9 months.
Conclusions: Off-label use of DES is associated with higher event rates compared with on-label use of DES, which is consistent with a higher risk clinical and lesion profile. However, event rates with off-label use of DES are lower compared with off-label use of BMS. Pending results from randomized trials, our data support the use of DES for off-label indications in selected patients.
Similar articles
-
Outcomes with drug-eluting stents versus bare metal stents in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: results from the Strategic Transcatheter Evaluation of New Therapies (STENT) Group.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Dec 1;72(7):893-900. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21767. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008. PMID: 19016465
-
Outcomes with drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents in saphenous vein graft intervention results from the STENT (strategic transcatheter evaluation of new therapies) group.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Nov;2(11):1105-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.08.020. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009. PMID: 19926052
-
Stent thrombosis, clinical events, and influence of prolonged clopidogrel use after placement of drug-eluting stent data from an observational cohort study of drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Oct;1(5):494-503. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.06.011. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008. PMID: 19463351
-
Recent progress in percutaneous coronary intervention: evolution of the drug-eluting stents, focus on the XIENCE V drug-eluting stent.Coron Artery Dis. 2010 Jan;21(1):46-56. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e328333f550. Coron Artery Dis. 2010. PMID: 19952925 Review.
-
Long-term risk of clinical events from stenting side branches of coronary bifurcation lesions with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: an observational meta-analysis.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Feb 1;77(2):202-12. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22750. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011. PMID: 20824754 Review.
Cited by
-
Long-term outcomes of intravascular ultrasound-guided implantation of bare metal stents versus drug-eluting stents in primary percutaneous coronary intervention.Korean J Intern Med. 2014 Jan;29(1):66-75. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2014.29.1.66. Epub 2014 Jan 2. Korean J Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 24574835 Free PMC article.
-
Rethinking elective colectomy for diverticulitis: a strategic approach to population health.World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov 28;20(44):16609-14. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i44.16609. World J Gastroenterol. 2014. PMID: 25469029 Free PMC article. Review.
-
An update on drug-eluting stents.Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2013 Feb;15(1):61-78. doi: 10.1007/s11936-012-0219-0. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2013. PMID: 23192748
-
Addressing the appropriateness of elective colon resection for diverticulitis: a report from the SCOAP CERTAIN collaborative.Ann Surg. 2014 Sep;260(3):533-8; discussion 538-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000894. Ann Surg. 2014. PMID: 25115429 Free PMC article.
-
New stent design for use in small coronary arteries during percutaneous coronary intervention.Med Devices (Auckl). 2010;3:57-66. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S13494. Epub 2010 Oct 19. Med Devices (Auckl). 2010. PMID: 22915922 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical