Influence of timing of clopidogrel treatment on the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an analysis of the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY) trial
- PMID: 19463378
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.10.004
Influence of timing of clopidogrel treatment on the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an analysis of the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY) trial
Abstract
Objectives: This study sought to determine if the efficacy of bivalirudin alone versus heparin plus a glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitor is dependent upon the duration of clopidogrel pre-treatment in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY) trial.
Background: The administration of a clopidogrel loading dose several hours before PCI reduces the risk of periprocedural thrombotic events.
Methods: Patients with an acute coronary syndrome were randomized to heparin plus a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor (control), bivalirudin plus a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor, or bivalirudin alone. Dose and timing of clopidogrel were left to the investigator's discretion.
Results: Of 13,819 patients randomized, 7,789 underwent PCI. When clopidogrel was initiated at any time before angiography or within 30 min after PCI, randomization to bivalirudin alone (n = 2,284) or control (n = 2,189) was associated with similar ischemic outcomes (8.2% vs. 8.3%, risk ratio: 0.98, 95% confidence interval: 0.81 to 1.20). Those patients who received clopidogrel >30 min after PCI or not at all experienced an increase in ischemic events when randomized to bivalirudin alone (n = 290) versus control (n = 317) (14.1% vs. 8.5%, risk ratio: 1.66, 95% confidence interval: 1.05 to 2.63). Major bleeding was significantly less frequent in patients treated with bivalirudin alone.
Conclusions: This post-hoc analysis suggests that in acute coronary syndrome patients, as long as clopidogrel is administered before or within 30 min of PCI treatment with bivalirudin alone is similarly effective to heparin plus a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor in suppressing 30-day ischemic events with significantly less bleeding. If it is anticipated that clopidogrel will be given late or not at all after PCI, bivalirudin alone may be associated with worse ischemic outcomes. (Comparison of Angiomax Versus Heparin in Acute Coronary Syndromes; NCT00093158).
Similar articles
-
Efficacy and safety of bivalirudin in patients receiving clopidogrel therapy after diagnostic angiography for percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Oct 1;76(4):513-24. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22546. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010. PMID: 20882655
-
Safety and efficacy of a prolonged bivalirudin infusion after urgent and complex percutaneous coronary interventions: a descriptive study.Coron Artery Dis. 2009 Aug;20(5):348-53. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e32832cff08. Coron Artery Dis. 2009. PMID: 19543084
-
Lack of clopidogrel pretreatment effect on the relative efficacy of bivalirudin with provisional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade compared to heparin with routine glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade: a REPLACE-2 substudy.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Sep 15;44(6):1194-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.06.049. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004. PMID: 15364319 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of heparin, bivalirudin, and different glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor regimens for anticoagulation during percutaneous coronary intervention: A network meta-analysis.Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2016 Dec;17(8):535-545. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2016.09.011. Epub 2016 Sep 30. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2016. PMID: 27842901 Review.
-
Comparison of bivalirudin versus heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients undergoing an invasive strategy: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Int J Cardiol. 2011 Nov 3;152(3):369-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.08.007. Epub 2010 Sep 16. Int J Cardiol. 2011. PMID: 20843568 Review.
Cited by
-
Benefits and risks of P2Y12 inhibitor preloading in patients with acute coronary syndrome and stable angina.J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2017 Oct;44(3):303-315. doi: 10.1007/s11239-017-1529-6. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2017. PMID: 28730406 Review.
-
Trends in use of anti-thrombotic agents and outcomes in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) managed with an invasive strategy.Indian Heart J. 2016 Jul-Aug;68(4):464-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2015.09.036. Epub 2016 Jan 18. Indian Heart J. 2016. PMID: 27543467 Free PMC article.
-
Appropriate anti-thrombotic/anti-thrombin therapy for thrombotic lesions.Curr Cardiol Rev. 2012 Aug;8(3):181-91. doi: 10.2174/157340312803217175. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2012. PMID: 22920489 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Interventional cardiology: Antithrombotic drug and stent choices in primary PCI.Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011 Aug 9;8(9):483-4. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2011.108. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011. PMID: 21826070 No abstract available.
-
Selecting the optimal antithrombotic regimen for patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2009;5:677-91. doi: 10.2147/vhrm.s4828. Epub 2009 Aug 20. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2009. PMID: 19707287 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous