A prospective feasibility trial investigating the use of the Impella 2.5 system in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (The PROTECT I Trial): initial U.S. experience
- PMID: 19463408
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.11.005
A prospective feasibility trial investigating the use of the Impella 2.5 system in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (The PROTECT I Trial): initial U.S. experience
Abstract
Objectives: We sought to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the Impella 2.5 system (Abiomed Inc., Danvers, Massachusetts) in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Background: The Impella 2.5 is a miniaturized percutaneous cardiac assist device, which provides up to 2.5 l/min forward flow from the left ventricle into the systemic circulation.
Methods: In a prospective, multicenter study, 20 patients underwent high-risk PCI with minimally invasive circulatory support employing the Impella 2.5 system. All patients had poor left ventricular function (ejection fraction <or=35%) and underwent PCI on an unprotected left main coronary artery or last patent coronary conduit. Patients with recent ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction or cardiogenic shock were excluded. The primary safety end point was the incidence of major adverse cardiac events at 30 days. The primary efficacy end point was freedom from hemodynamic compromise during PCI (defined as a decrease in mean arterial pressure below 60 mm Hg for >10 min).
Results: The Impella 2.5 device was implanted successfully in all patients. The mean duration of circulatory support was 1.7 +/- 0.6 h (range: 0.4 to 2.5 h). Mean pump flow during PCI was 2.2 +/- 0.3 l/min. At 30 days, the incidence of major adverse cardiac events was 20% (2 patients had a periprocedural myocardial infarction; 2 patients died at days 12 and 14). There was no evidence of aortic valve injury, cardiac perforation, or limb ischemia. Two patients (10%) developed mild, transient hemolysis without clinical sequelae. None of the patients developed hemodynamic compromise during PCI.
Conclusions: The Impella 2.5 system is safe, easy to implant, and provides excellent hemodynamic support during high-risk PCI. (The PROTECT I Trial; NCT00534859).
Similar articles
-
Prophylactic use of intra-aortic balloon pump for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: will the Impella LP 2.5 device show superiority in a clinical randomized study?Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2010 Apr-Jun;11(2):91-7. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2009.07.006. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2010. PMID: 20347798
-
Supported high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with the Impella 2.5 device the Europella registry.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Dec 15;54(25):2430-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.09.018. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009. PMID: 20082934
-
High-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with the TandemHeart and Impella devices: a single-center experience.J Invasive Cardiol. 2011 Oct;23(10):417-24. J Invasive Cardiol. 2011. PMID: 21972160
-
Use of the Impella 2.5 in high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention.Crit Care Nurse. 2011 Feb;31(1):e1-16. doi: 10.4037/ccn2011293. Crit Care Nurse. 2011. PMID: 21285459 Review.
-
Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices: A Health Technology Assessment.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2017 Feb 7;17(2):1-97. eCollection 2017. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2017. PMID: 28232854 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Short-term mechanical circulatory support (intra-aortic balloon pump, Impella, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, TandemHeart): a review.Ann Transl Med. 2020 Jul;8(13):829. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-2171. Ann Transl Med. 2020. PMID: 32793674 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The effect of combined treatment with Impella(®) and landiolol in a swine model of acute myocardial infarction.J Artif Organs. 2012 Sep;15(3):231-9. doi: 10.1007/s10047-012-0640-x. Epub 2012 Apr 13. J Artif Organs. 2012. PMID: 22527977
-
Acute complication due to impella 2.5 device (superficial femoral artery thrombosis): managed successfully with novel aspiration thrombectomy catheter (pronto v3).Clin Med Insights Cardiol. 2011 Feb 10;5:17-21. doi: 10.4137/CMC.S6157. Clin Med Insights Cardiol. 2011. PMID: 21344022 Free PMC article.
-
Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices for High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2018 Jan 19;20(1):2. doi: 10.1007/s11886-018-0946-2. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2018. PMID: 29350305 Review.
-
Complete percutaneous coronary revascularization: An elegant solution to left ventricular dysfunction caused by severe coronary artery disease.Clin Case Rep. 2024 Aug 5;12(8):e9224. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.9224. eCollection 2024 Aug. Clin Case Rep. 2024. PMID: 39104738 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous