Late results after percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale for secondary prevention of paradoxical embolism using the amplatzer PFO occluder without intraprocedural echocardiography: effect of device size
- PMID: 19463412
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.09.013
Late results after percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale for secondary prevention of paradoxical embolism using the amplatzer PFO occluder without intraprocedural echocardiography: effect of device size
Abstract
Objectives: We sought to assess the safety and clinical efficacy of patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure under fluoroscopic guidance only, without intraprocedural echocardiography.
Background: Percutaneous PFO closure has been shown to be safe and feasible using several devices. It is generally performed using simultaneously fluoroscopic and transesophageal or intracardiac echocardiographic guidance. Transesophageal echocardiography requires sedation or general anesthesia and intubation to avoid aspiration. Intracardiac echocardiography is costly and has inherent risks. Both lengthen the procedure. The Amplatzer PFO Occluder (AGA Medical Corporation, Golden Valley, Minnesota) can be safely implanted without echocardiographic guidance.
Methods: A total of 620 patients (51 +/- 12 years; 66% male) underwent PFO closure using the Amplatzer PFO Occluder for secondary prevention of presumed paradoxical embolism. Based on size and mobility of the PFO and the interatrial septum, an 18-mm device was used in 50 patients, a 25-mm device in 492, and a 35-mm device in 78.
Results: All procedures were successful, with 5 procedural complications (0.8%): 4 arteriovenous fistulae requiring elective surgical correction, and 1 transient ischemic attack. Contrast transesophageal echocardiography at 6 months showed complete closure in 91% of patients, whereas a minimal, moderate, or large residual shunt persisted in 6%, 2%, and 1%, respectively. During a mean follow-up period of 3.0 +/- 1.9 years (median: 2.6 years; total patient-years: 1,871), 5 ischemic strokes, 8 transient ischemic attacks, and no peripheral emboli were reported. Freedom from recurrent ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, or peripheral embolism was 99% at 1 year, 99% at 2 years, and 97% at 5 years.
Conclusions: The Amplatzer PFO Occluder affords excellent safety and long-term clinical efficacy of percutaneous PFO closure without intraprocedural echocardiography.
Comment in
-
Patent foramen ovale closure without echocardiography: are we closing the door too fast too soon?JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Feb;2(2):124-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.12.001. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009. PMID: 19463413 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Clinical outcomes of patent foramen ovale closure for paradoxical emboli without echocardiographic guidance.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2004 Aug;62(4):519-25. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20121. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2004. PMID: 15274165
-
Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) in patients with paradoxical embolism: procedural and follow-up results after implantation of the Amplatzer®-occluder device.J Interv Cardiol. 2011 Feb;24(1):85-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2010.00593.x. Epub 2010 Aug 23. J Interv Cardiol. 2011. PMID: 20735710
-
Is routine ultrasound guidance really necessary for closure of patent foramen ovale using the Amplatzer PFO occluder?Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Feb 15;73(3):361-6. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21859. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009. PMID: 19133676
-
Impact of Percutaneous Closure of Interatrial Shunts on Migraine Attacks: Single-Operator Series and Review of the Literature.Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2017;12(2):129-138. doi: 10.2174/1574887112666170328124939. Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2017. PMID: 28356032 Review.
-
A Review of Transcatheter Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale.Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2017 Jul-Sep;13(3):152-159. doi: 10.14797/mdcj-13-3-152. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2017. PMID: 29744000 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The incidence of peripheral arterial embolism in association with a patent foramen ovale (right-to-left shunt).JRSM Short Rep. 2011 May;2(5):35. doi: 10.1258/shorts.2011.010074. Epub 2011 May 3. JRSM Short Rep. 2011. PMID: 21637396 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term clinical outcomes for patients with uncrossable patent foramen ovale.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Oct 13;10:1249259. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1249259. eCollection 2023. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023. PMID: 37900574 Free PMC article.
-
Patent foramen ovale and closure technique with the amplatzer occluder.Scientifica (Cairo). 2014;2014:129196. doi: 10.1155/2014/129196. Epub 2014 Jun 25. Scientifica (Cairo). 2014. PMID: 25054076 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Practical Scoring System to Select Optimally Sized Devices for Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure.J Struct Heart Dis. 2016 Oct;2(5):217-223. doi: 10.12945/j.jshd.2016.009.15. J Struct Heart Dis. 2016. PMID: 29104878 Free PMC article.
-
Safety and Efficacy of the Amplatzer Septal Occluder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Apr;37:52-60. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2021.06.002. Epub 2021 Jun 17. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022. PMID: 34183276 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous