Similar articles

• Late results after percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale for secondary prevention of paradoxical embolism using the amplatzer PFO occluder without intraprocedural echocardiography: effect of device size.

  Wahl A, Tai T, Praz F, Schwerzmann M, Seiler C, Nedeltchev K, Windecker S, Mattle HP, Meier B. Wahl A, et al. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Feb;2(2):116-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.09.013. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009. PMID: 19463412
• Eliminating right-to-left shunt with patent foramen ovale closure: not as simple as it seems.

  Rogers JH, Smith TW. Rogers JH, et al. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Jun;2(6):568-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.04.006. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009. PMID: 19539263 No abstract available.
• [Interventional closure of persistent foramen ovale in patients after crytogenic stroke].

  Chatterjee T, Akin I, Nienaber CA, Rehders TC, Ortak J, Chatterjee A, Ince H. Chatterjee T, et al. Praxis (Bern 1994). 2010 Oct 6;99(20):1203-15. doi: 10.1024/1661-8157/a000263. Praxis (Bern 1994). 2010. PMID: 20931496 Review. German.
• Paradoxical embolism as a cause of myocardial infarction in a patient with pulmonary embolism: role of transesophageal echocardiography.

  Kikuni G, Silance PG, Debbas N, Unger P. Kikuni G, et al. Acta Cardiol. 2019 Dec;74(6):551-552. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2018.1544682. Epub 2019 Jan 16. Acta Cardiol. 2019. PMID: 30650030 No abstract available.
• Echocardiographic features of PFOs and paradoxical embolism: a complicated puzzle.

  Aggeli C, Verveniotis A, Andrikopoulou E, Vavuranakis E, Toutouzas K, Tousoulis D. Aggeli C, et al. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Dec;34(12):1849-1861. doi: 10.1007/s10554-018-1406-1. Epub 2018 Jun 28. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018. PMID: 29956022 Review.