Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2009 Apr;2(4):357-63.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.01.008.

Baseline fractional flow reserve and stent diameter predict optimal post-stent fractional flow reserve and major adverse cardiac events after bare-metal stent deployment

Affiliations
Free article
Multicenter Study

Baseline fractional flow reserve and stent diameter predict optimal post-stent fractional flow reserve and major adverse cardiac events after bare-metal stent deployment

Habib Samady et al. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Apr.
Free article

Abstract

Objectives: We sought to identify baseline clinical, angiographic, and hemodynamic variables associated with optimal bare-metal stent (BMS) deployment, allowing selection of patients for treatment with BMS.

Background: Patients with fractional flow reserve (FFR) >0.90 after BMS have low (<6%) major adverse cardiac event rates (MACE). We hypothesized that baseline variables can predict post-stent FFR >0.90 and MACE after BMS.

Methods: In 586 patients from the multicenter post-BMS FFR registry, we developed multivariable logistic regression models to identify clinical, angiographic, and hemodynamic variables associated with post-stent FFR >or=0.90 and 6-month MACE.

Results: After adjusting for potential confounders, baseline FFR (odds ratio [OR]: 5.0) and stent diameter (OR: 2.5 per millimeter) were predictive of post-stent FFR >0.90. Lower FFR (OR: 7.8); smaller stent diameter (OR: 3.7 per millimeter); longer stent length (OR: 1.0 per millimeter); and larger minimal luminal diameter (OR: 2.2 per millimeter) were predictors of MACE. In patients receiving 3-mm diameter stents, baseline FFR >0.70 yielded significantly higher likelihood of achieving post-stent FFR >0.90 than baseline FFR <or=0.70 (77% vs. 63%, p < 0.05); and in patients receiving <3-mm diameter stents, baseline FFR <0.50 was associated with higher MACE than FFR 0.50 to 0.70, and FFR >0.70 (40% vs. 15% vs. 13%, p < 0.05).

Conclusions: In patients receiving BMS, baseline FFR and stent diameter are predictors of post-stent FFR >0.90; and baseline FFR, stent diameter, stent length, and minimal luminal diameter are predictors of MACE. These variables may allow selection of patients who will have excellent results with BMS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types

MeSH terms