Ionic low-osmolar versus nonionic iso-osmolar contrast media to obviate worsening nephropathy after angioplasty in chronic renal failure patients: the ICON (Ionic versus non-ionic Contrast to Obviate worsening Nephropathy after angioplasty in chronic renal failure patients) study
- PMID: 19463464
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.03.007
Ionic low-osmolar versus nonionic iso-osmolar contrast media to obviate worsening nephropathy after angioplasty in chronic renal failure patients: the ICON (Ionic versus non-ionic Contrast to Obviate worsening Nephropathy after angioplasty in chronic renal failure patients) study
Abstract
Objectives: This randomized, prospective, double-blind, multicenter study compared nephrotoxicity of the nonionic iso-osmolar contrast media (CM) iodixanol versus the ionic low-osmolar CM ioxaglate in patients with chronic renal insufficiency undergoing coronary angiography.
Background: The properties of iodinated CM might contribute to the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN).
Methods: Patients with renal impairment undergoing coronary angiography were randomly assigned to iodixanol (n = 72) or ioxaglate (n = 74).
Results: Baseline characteristics were well-matched between the 2 groups. The predicted risk score for CIN was similar in the iodixanol and in the ioxaglate groups (11.9 +/- 4.1 vs. 11.8 +/- 4.1), as was the use of N-acetylcysteine (70% vs. 73%). The primary end point of the study, median peak increase of serum creatinine from day 0 through day 3 after angiography, did not differ between the iodixanol (0.09 mg/dl; interquartile range 0.00 to 0.30 mg/dl) and the ioxaglate (0.15 mg/dl; interquartile range 0.00 to 0.40 mg/dl; p = 0.07) groups. The percentages of patients with a peak increase of serum creatinine >or=0.5 mg/dl (15.9% in iodixanol vs. 18.2% in ioxaglate), >or=1.0 mg/dl (1.4% vs. 4.5%), and >or=25% or >or=0.5 mg/dl (15.9% vs. 24.2%, respectively) also did not differ significantly between the 2 groups.
Conclusions: In high-risk patients undergoing coronary angiographic procedures, use of the nonionic iso-osmolar CM iodixanol does not reduce renal deterioration in patients with renal impairment, compared with the ionic low-osmolar CM ioxaglate. Given that the study was underpowered to compare nephrotoxicity of the 2 groups under the active medical protection of CIN, a larger randomized study is warranted that will enroll patients with higher risks of CIN under a strict control of hydration regimens and adjunctive medications.
Similar articles
-
One-year results of the ICON (Ionic versus non-ionic Contrast to Obviate worsening Nephropathy after angioplasty in chronic renal failure patients) Study.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Mar;87(4):703-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26106. Epub 2015 Oct 20. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016. PMID: 26481591 Clinical Trial.
-
Renal toxicity evaluation and comparison between visipaque (iodixanol) and hexabrix (ioxaglate) in patients with renal insufficiency undergoing coronary angiography: the RECOVER study: a randomized controlled trial.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Sep 5;48(5):924-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.06.047. Epub 2006 Aug 17. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006. PMID: 16949481 Clinical Trial.
-
A prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial on the efficacy and cardiorenal safety of iodixanol vs. iopromide in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing coronary angiography with or without percutaneous coronary intervention.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Dec 1;72(7):958-65. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21713. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008. PMID: 19021282 Clinical Trial.
-
Iodixanol versus iopromide in patients with renal insufficiency undergoing coronary angiography with or without PCI.Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 May;97(18):e0617. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010617. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018. PMID: 29718868 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The relative renal safety of iodixanol compared with low-osmolar contrast media: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Jul;2(7):645-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.05.002. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009. PMID: 19628188 Review.
Cited by
-
Effects of Intra-Arterial and Intravenous Iso-Osmolar Contrast Medium (Iodixanol) on the Risk of Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury: A Meta-Analysis.Cardiorenal Med. 2011;1(4):220-234. doi: 10.1159/000332384. Epub 2011 Oct 4. Cardiorenal Med. 2011. PMID: 22164156 Free PMC article.
-
Contrast induced nephropathy: updated ESUR Contrast Media Safety Committee guidelines.Eur Radiol. 2011 Dec;21(12):2527-41. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2225-0. Epub 2011 Aug 25. Eur Radiol. 2011. PMID: 21866433 Review.
-
Renal Safety of Iodinated Contrast Media Depending on Their Osmolarity - Current Outlooks.Pol J Radiol. 2016 Apr 11;81:157-65. doi: 10.12659/PJR.895406. eCollection 2016. Pol J Radiol. 2016. PMID: 27141236 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Contrast-induced acute kidney injury and renal support for acute kidney injury: a KDIGO summary (Part 2).Crit Care. 2013 Feb 4;17(1):205. doi: 10.1186/cc11455. Crit Care. 2013. PMID: 23394215 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Randomized trial of one-hour sodium bicarbonate vs standard periprocedural saline hydration in chronic kidney disease patients undergoing cardiovascular contrast procedures.PLoS One. 2018 Feb 8;13(2):e0189372. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189372. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29420536 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical