Left ventricular conduction delays and relation to QRS configuration in patients with left ventricular dysfunction
- PMID: 19463519
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.01.379
Left ventricular conduction delays and relation to QRS configuration in patients with left ventricular dysfunction
Abstract
Left ventricular activation delay (LVAT) >100 ms may determine response to cardiac resynchronization therapy, but its prevalence and relation to QRS configuration are unknown. QRS duration and LVAT in control subjects (n = 30) were compared with those in patients with heart failure (HF; LV ejection fraction 23 +/- 8%, n = 120) with a QRS duration <120 ms (NQRS(HF), n = 35) or > or = 120 ms (left bundle branch block [LBBB(HF)], n = 54; right bundle branch block [RBBB(HF)], n = 31). LVAT was estimated by interval from QRS onset to basal inferolateral LV depolarization. In controls, QRS duration was 82 +/- 13 ms and LVAT was 55 +/- 18 ms. LVAT was always <100 ms. In patients with NQRS(HF), QRS duration (104 +/- 10 ms) and LVAT (82 +/- 22 ms) were prolonged versus controls (p <0.001). LVAT exceeded 100 ms in 8 of 35 patients. In patients with LBBB(HF), QRS duration (161 +/- 29 ms) and LVAT (136 +/- 33 ms) were prolonged compared with controls and patients with NQRS(HF) (p <0.001). LVAT exceeded 100 ms in 47 of 54 patients. In patients with RBBB(HF), QRS duration did not differ from that in patients with LBBB(HF), but LVAT (100 +/- 24 ms) was shorter (p <0.001). In 17 of 31 patients with RBBB(HF) LVAT was <100 ms (82 +/- 12), similar to those with NQRS(HF) (p = NS), indicating no LV conduction delay. However, in 7 of 31, LVAT (135 +/- 13 ms) was similar to that in patients with LBBB(HF) (p = NS). LVAT correlation with QRS duration varied (control p = 0.004, NQRS(HF) p = 0.15, RBBB(HF) p = 0.01, LBBB(HF) p <0.001). In conclusion, LV conduction delays in patients with HF varied with QRS configuration and duration, exceeding 100 ms in only 23% of patients with narrow QRS configuration and 45% with RBBB(HF) compared with 87% with LBBB(HF). Fewer than 25% of patients with RBBB(HF) demonstrated delays equivalent to those in patients with LBBB(HF.) These variations may affect efficacy to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Similar articles
-
Left ventricular conduction delays induced by right ventricular apical pacing: effect of left ventricular dysfunction and bundle branch block.J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008 Feb;19(2):114-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2007.00995.x. Epub 2007 Oct 24. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008. PMID: 17971145
-
Left ventricular electromechanical delay in patients with heart failure and normal QRS duration and in patients with right and left bundle branch block.Europace. 2007 Jan;9(1):41-7. doi: 10.1093/europace/eul144. Europace. 2007. PMID: 17224421
-
Significance of QRS morphology in determining the prevalence of mechanical dyssynchrony in heart failure patients eligible for cardiac resynchronization: particular focus on patients with right bundle branch block with and without coexistent left-sided conduction defects.Europace. 2008 May;10(5):566-71. doi: 10.1093/europace/eun081. Epub 2008 Apr 3. Europace. 2008. PMID: 18390536 Clinical Trial.
-
Significance of QRS complex duration in patients with heart failure.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Dec 20;46(12):2183-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.01.071. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005. PMID: 16360044 Review.
-
Does cardiac resynchronisation therapy improve survival and quality of life in patients with end-stage heart failure?Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2008 Dec;7(6):1141-6. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2008.183707. Epub 2008 Jun 9. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2008. PMID: 18541605 Review.
Cited by
-
[Management of heart failure with His bundle pacing in right bundle branch block: case report].Arch Cardiol Mex. 2021;91(1):93-99. doi: 10.24875/ACM.19000402. Arch Cardiol Mex. 2021. PMID: 33661876 Free PMC article. Spanish.
-
Non-invasively quantified changes in left ventricular activation predict outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy.J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019 Nov;30(11):2475-2483. doi: 10.1111/jce.14192. Epub 2019 Oct 8. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019. PMID: 31535746 Free PMC article.
-
Vectorcardiography-derived index allows a robust quantification of ventricular electrical synchrony.Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 15;12(1):9961. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14000-8. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 35705598 Free PMC article.
-
Fragmented QRS is associated with intraventricular dyssynchrony and independently predicts nonresponse to cardiac resynchronization therapy-Systematic review and meta-analysis.Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2020 Jul;25(4):e12750. doi: 10.1111/anec.12750. Epub 2020 Mar 18. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2020. PMID: 32187770 Free PMC article.
-
Anodal stimulation: an underrecognized cause of nonresponders to cardiac resynchronization therapy.Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2011 May 1;11(3):64-72. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2011. PMID: 21556155 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous