The dynamic natures of implant loading
- PMID: 19463663
- DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60079-2
The dynamic natures of implant loading
Abstract
Statement of problem: A fundamental problem in fully understanding the dynamic nature of implant loading is the confusion that exists regarding the torque load delivered to the implant complex, the initial force transformation/stress/strain developed within the system during the implant complex assembly, and how the clamping forces at the interfaces and the preload stress impact the implant prior to any external loading.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to create an accurately dimensioned finite element model with spiral threads and threaded bores included in the implant complex, positioned in a bone model, and to determine the magnitude and distribution of the force transformation/stress/strain patterns developed in the modeled implant system and bone and, thus, provide the foundational data for the study of the dynamic loading of dental implants prior to any external loading.
Material and methods: An implant (Brånemark Mark III), abutment (CeraOne), abutment screw (Unigrip), and the bone surrounding the implant were modeled using HyperMesh software. The threaded interfaces between screw/implant and implant/bone were designed as a spiral thread helix assigned with specific coefficient of friction values. Assembly simulation using ABAQUS and LS-DYNA was accomplished by applying a 32-Ncm horizontal torque load on the abutment screw (Step 1), then decreasing the torque load to 0 Ncm to simulate the wrench removal (Step 2). The postscript data were collected and reviewed by HyperMesh. A regression analysis was used to depict the relationships between the torque load and the mechanical parameters.
Results: During the 32-Ncm tightening sequence, the abutment screw elongated 13.3 mum. The tightening torque generated a 554-N clamping force at the abutment/implant interface and a 522-N preload. The von Mises stress values were 248 MPa in the abutment at the abutment-implant interface, 765 MPa at the top of the screw shaft, 694 MPa at the bottom of the screw shaft, 1365 MPa in the top screw thread, and 21 MPa in the bone at the top of the implant-bone interface. This study also identified various characteristic isosurface stress patterns. The maximum stress magnitude to complete the von Mises stress joint pattern in the present model was 107 MPa during screw tightening, and was reduced to 104 MPa with removal of the wrench. Various specific stress patterns were identified within all elements of the implant complex during the assembly simulation.
Conclusions: During the torque moment application, the abutment screw was elongated, and every 1.0-mum elongation of the screw was equivalent to a 47.9-N increase of the preload in the implant complex. The ideal index to determine the preload amount was the contact force at the interface between the screw threads and the threaded screw bore. The isosurface mode identified various characteristic stress patterns developed within the implant complex at the various interfaces during the assembly simulation. These patterns are the (1) spiral and ying-yang pattern of the XY stress, (2) spring, cap, clamping, and preload pattern of the ZZ stress, and (3) bone holding and joint pattern of the von Mises stress.
Similar articles
-
Probabilistic analysis of preload in the abutment screw of a dental implant complex.J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Sep;100(3):183-93. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60177-8. J Prosthet Dent. 2008. PMID: 18762030
-
Finite element analysis to determine implant preload.J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Dec;90(6):539-46. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.09.012. J Prosthet Dent. 2003. PMID: 14668754
-
Critical bending moment of implant-abutment screw joint interfaces: effect of torque levels and implant diameter.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004 Sep-Oct;19(5):648-58. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004. PMID: 15508980
-
Finite element stress analysis of cuneiform and cylindrical threaded implant geometries.Technol Health Care. 2006;14(4-5):421-38. Technol Health Care. 2006. PMID: 17065763 Review.
-
Implant screw mechanics.Dent Clin North Am. 1998 Jan;42(1):71-89. Dent Clin North Am. 1998. PMID: 9421671 Review.
Cited by
-
Biomimetic Design and Assessment via Microenvironmental Testing: From Food Packaging Biomaterials to Implantable Medical Devices.Biomimetics (Basel). 2025 Jun 5;10(6):370. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics10060370. Biomimetics (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40558339 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effect of Thermodynamic Cyclic Loading on Screw Loosening of Tightened Versus New Abutment Screw in Bone Level and Tissue Level Implants in DIO Implant Company (In-Vitro Study).Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025 Aug;11(4):e70162. doi: 10.1002/cre2.70162. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025. PMID: 40574586 Free PMC article.
-
Sclerostin and occlusion: A brief review.J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2015 Jan-Feb;19(1):11-3. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.145785. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2015. PMID: 25810586 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A three-dimensional finite element study on the stress distribution pattern of two prosthetic abutments for external hexagon implants.Eur J Dent. 2013 Oct;7(4):484-491. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.120642. Eur J Dent. 2013. PMID: 24932125 Free PMC article.
-
Three-dimensional finite element analysis of platform switched implant.J Adv Prosthodont. 2017 Feb;9(1):31-37. doi: 10.4047/jap.2017.9.1.31. Epub 2017 Feb 7. J Adv Prosthodont. 2017. PMID: 28243389 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous