The impact of negative attentional set upon target processing in RSVP: an ERP study
- PMID: 19465037
- DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.05.008
The impact of negative attentional set upon target processing in RSVP: an ERP study
Abstract
This study investigates whether the negative attentional set, a form of top-down attentional bias, can be set up on a trial-by-trial basis and impair online target processing in an RSVP (Rapid Serial Visual Presentation) task in which two targets are to be identified. Using the N2pc (N2 posterior contralateral) - a component in the event-related potential (ERP) evoked by lateralized targets - as an index of attentional selection, we demonstrated that the online processing of the second target (T2) can be inhibited by a category-specific negative attentional set elicited by a special distractor (D1) prior to the first target (T1) and that this attentional set can be set up at an abstract, conceptual level. A digit T2 was presented on the left or right following a central RSVP letter stream which had a unique red letter T1. Another digit or a Chinese number character was presented prior to T1 as D1, which had to be ignored. Relative to the D1 absent condition, either type of D1 impaired T2 performance and delayed the N2pc response to T2. D1 elicited a frontocentral N2 peaking at about 300 ms post-onset of D1, suggesting that D1 is indeed an inhibition-evoking stimulus. A further behavioral experiment ruled out the possibility that D1 impairs T2 performance via attentional capture or a category-unspecific, general negative attentional set.
Similar articles
-
Electrophysiological indices of target and distractor processing in visual search.J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Apr;21(4):760-75. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21039. J Cogn Neurosci. 2009. PMID: 18564048
-
The attentional blink reveals serial working memory encoding: evidence from virtual and human event-related potentials.J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Mar;21(3):550-66. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21036. J Cogn Neurosci. 2009. PMID: 18564042
-
Negative attentional set in the attentional blink: control is not lost.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Nov;73(8):2489-501. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0207-6. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011. PMID: 21901571
-
The functional architecture of divided visual attention.Prog Brain Res. 2009;176:101-21. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17607-0. Prog Brain Res. 2009. PMID: 19733752 Review.
-
Suppression of EEG gamma activity may cause the attentional blink.Conscious Cogn. 2002 Mar;11(1):114-22. doi: 10.1006/ccog.2001.0536. Conscious Cogn. 2002. PMID: 11883991 Review.
Cited by
-
The influence of distracter and target features on distracter induced blindness.Adv Cogn Psychol. 2012;8(1):62-9. doi: 10.2478/v10053-008-0103-3. Epub 2012 Feb 15. Adv Cogn Psychol. 2012. PMID: 22419967 Free PMC article.
-
Distractor-Induced Blindness: A Special Case of Contingent Attentional Capture?Adv Cogn Psychol. 2017 Mar 31;13(1):52-63. doi: 10.5709/acp-0206-5. eCollection 2017. Adv Cogn Psychol. 2017. PMID: 28439320 Free PMC article.
-
Event-related potentials of stimuli inhibition and access in cross-modal distractor-induced blindness.PLoS One. 2024 Oct 23;19(10):e0309425. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309425. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39441852 Free PMC article.
-
Get Set or Get Distracted? Disentangling Content-Priming and Attention-Catching Effects of Background Lure Stimuli on Identifying Targets in Two Simultaneously Presented Series.Brain Sci. 2019 Dec 11;9(12):365. doi: 10.3390/brainsci9120365. Brain Sci. 2019. PMID: 31835694 Free PMC article.
-
Attention and prediction modulations in expected and unexpected visuospatial trajectories.PLoS One. 2021 Oct 8;16(10):e0242753. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242753. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34624029 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources