Influence of luting agents on time required for cast post removal by ultrasound: an in vitro study
- PMID: 19466241
- PMCID: PMC4399522
- DOI: 10.1590/s1678-77572009000300003
Influence of luting agents on time required for cast post removal by ultrasound: an in vitro study
Abstract
Objective: This in vitro study evaluated the influence of luting agents on ultrasonic vibration time for intraradicular cast post removal.
Material and methods: After endodontic treatment, 30 roots of extracted human canines were embedded in resin cylinders. The post-holes were prepared at 10 mm depth and their impressions were taken using autopolymerizing acrylic resin. After casting procedures using a nickel-chromium alloy, the posts were randomly distributed into 3 groups (n=10) according to the luting material: G1- zinc phosphate (SS White) (control group), G2 - glass ionomer cement (Vidrion C; SS White), and G3- resin cement (C & B; Bisco). In G3, the adhesive procedure was performed before post cementation. After 24 h, the cement line was removed at the post/tooth interface using a fine diamond bur, and the ST-09 tip of an Enac ultrasound unit was applied at maximum power on all surfaces surrounding the posts. The application time was recorded with a chronometer until the post was completely dislodged and data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey's test (p<0.05).
Results: The roots were removed from the acrylic resin and inspected to detect cracks and/or fractures. The means for G1, G2, and G3 were 168.5, 59.5, and 285 s, respectively, with statistically significant differences among them. Two G3 posts resisted removal, one of which developed a vertical fracture line.
Conclusions: Therefore, the cement type had a direct influence on the time required for ultrasonic post removal. Compared to the zinc phosphate and glass ionomer cements, the resin cement required a longer ultrasonic vibration time.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Comparison of different ultrasonic vibration modes for post removal.Braz Dent J. 2012;23(1):49-53. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402012000100009. Braz Dent J. 2012. PMID: 22460315
-
The influence of ultrasound on the retention of cast posts cemented with different agents.Int Endod J. 2001 Mar;34(2):93-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00353.x. Int Endod J. 2001. PMID: 11307266 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of the time required for removal of intraradicular cast posts using two Brazilian ultrasound devices.Braz Oral Res. 2009 Jan-Mar;23(1):17-22. doi: 10.1590/s1806-83242009000100004. Braz Oral Res. 2009. PMID: 19488467
-
Evaluation of several protocols for the application of ultrasound during the removal of cast intraradicular posts cemented with zinc phosphate cement.Int Endod J. 2009 Jul;42(7):609-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01555.x. Epub 2009 May 8. Int Endod J. 2009. PMID: 19467051 Clinical Trial.
-
Factors influencing the removal of posts.Int Endod J. 2003 Oct;36(10):687-90. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00715.x. Int Endod J. 2003. PMID: 14511226
Cited by
-
Direct or indirect post crowns to restore compromised teeth: a review of the literature.Br Dent J. 2018 Mar 23;224(6):413-418. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.218. Br Dent J. 2018. PMID: 29569608 Review.
-
The influence of ultrasound on removal of prefabricated metal post cemented with different resin cements.Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2013 Nov;10(6):760-3. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2013. PMID: 24379864 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of time interval between core preparation and post cementation on pushout bond strength of glass fiber-reinforced posts.J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2017 Oct-Dec;17(4):381-387. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_36_17. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2017. PMID: 29249882 Free PMC article.
-
Waiting time for coronal preparation and the influence of different cements on tensile strength of metal posts.Int J Dent. 2012;2012:785427. doi: 10.1155/2012/785427. Epub 2012 Jan 15. Int J Dent. 2012. PMID: 22291705 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of Glass Fiber Post Design and Luting Cements on Ease of Post Removal and Fracture Strength of Endodontically Retreated Teeth: An In Vitro Study.J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2022 Apr 8;12(2):199-209. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_249_21. eCollection 2022 Mar-Apr. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2022. PMID: 35462745 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Abbott PV. Incidence of root fractures and methods used for post removal. Int Endod J. 2002;35(1):63–67. - PubMed
-
- Bonfante G, Kaizer OB, Pegoraro LF, Valle AL. Tensile bond strength of glass fiber posts luted with different cements. Braz Oral Res. 2007;21(2):159–164. - PubMed
-
- Castrisos T, Abbott PV. A survey of methods used for post removal specialist endodontic practice. Int Endod J. 2002;35(2):172–180. - PubMed
-
- Cury AH, Goracci C, Navarro MFL, Carvalho RM, Sadek FT, Tay FR, et al. Effect of hygroscopic expansion on the push-out resistance of glass ionomer-based cements used for the luting of glass fiber posts. J Endod. 2006;32(6):537–540. - PubMed
-
- Dixon EB, Kaczkowski PJ, Nicholls JI, Harrington GW. Comparison of two ultrasonic instruments for post removal. J Endod. 2002;28(2):111–115. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous