Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 May-Jun;17(3):145-9.
doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572009000300003.

Influence of luting agents on time required for cast post removal by ultrasound: an in vitro study

Affiliations

Influence of luting agents on time required for cast post removal by ultrasound: an in vitro study

Janir Alves Soares et al. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009 May-Jun.

Abstract

Objective: This in vitro study evaluated the influence of luting agents on ultrasonic vibration time for intraradicular cast post removal.

Material and methods: After endodontic treatment, 30 roots of extracted human canines were embedded in resin cylinders. The post-holes were prepared at 10 mm depth and their impressions were taken using autopolymerizing acrylic resin. After casting procedures using a nickel-chromium alloy, the posts were randomly distributed into 3 groups (n=10) according to the luting material: G1- zinc phosphate (SS White) (control group), G2 - glass ionomer cement (Vidrion C; SS White), and G3- resin cement (C & B; Bisco). In G3, the adhesive procedure was performed before post cementation. After 24 h, the cement line was removed at the post/tooth interface using a fine diamond bur, and the ST-09 tip of an Enac ultrasound unit was applied at maximum power on all surfaces surrounding the posts. The application time was recorded with a chronometer until the post was completely dislodged and data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey's test (p<0.05).

Results: The roots were removed from the acrylic resin and inspected to detect cracks and/or fractures. The means for G1, G2, and G3 were 168.5, 59.5, and 285 s, respectively, with statistically significant differences among them. Two G3 posts resisted removal, one of which developed a vertical fracture line.

Conclusions: Therefore, the cement type had a direct influence on the time required for ultrasonic post removal. Compared to the zinc phosphate and glass ionomer cements, the resin cement required a longer ultrasonic vibration time.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1. Procedures for intraradicular cast post removal. 1A- wear of the core using the #1557 bur; 1B- wear of the cement line (2 mm depth) using the # 3203 diamond bur; 1C- application of the ultrasound tip in all core surfaces

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abbott PV. Incidence of root fractures and methods used for post removal. Int Endod J. 2002;35(1):63–67. - PubMed
    1. Bonfante G, Kaizer OB, Pegoraro LF, Valle AL. Tensile bond strength of glass fiber posts luted with different cements. Braz Oral Res. 2007;21(2):159–164. - PubMed
    1. Castrisos T, Abbott PV. A survey of methods used for post removal specialist endodontic practice. Int Endod J. 2002;35(2):172–180. - PubMed
    1. Cury AH, Goracci C, Navarro MFL, Carvalho RM, Sadek FT, Tay FR, et al. Effect of hygroscopic expansion on the push-out resistance of glass ionomer-based cements used for the luting of glass fiber posts. J Endod. 2006;32(6):537–540. - PubMed
    1. Dixon EB, Kaczkowski PJ, Nicholls JI, Harrington GW. Comparison of two ultrasonic instruments for post removal. J Endod. 2002;28(2):111–115. - PubMed