Minimally invasive surgical options for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: A significant step in the right direction
- PMID: 19468425
- PMCID: PMC2684299
- DOI: 10.4103/0970-1591.45533
Minimally invasive surgical options for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: A significant step in the right direction
Abstract
Open pyeloplasty is the gold standard treatment for adult ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) with published success rates consistently over 90%. In recent years, the management of UPJO has been revolutionized by the introduction of endoscopic procedures and laparoscopic techniques. We analyzed the long-term results of endoscopic and other minimal access approaches for the treatment of UPJO.Early results for endopyelotomy were promising but long-term results were not encouraging. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty technique is well defined and duplicates the surgical principles of conventional open pyeloplasty. With such a large variety of minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of UPJO available, the treatment choice for UPJO must be based on the success and morbidity of the procedures, the surgeon's experience, the cost of the treatment, and the patient's choice. We feel that with the technological advances in instrumentation coupled with a decrease in cost and improved training of urological surgeons, laparoscopic pyeloplasty may evolve to be the new "gold" standard for the treatment of UPJO.
Keywords: Acucise; balloon dilatation; endopyelotomy; laparoscopy; pelviureteric junction obstruction; robotic.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus open pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.J Pediatr Urol. 2016 Dec;12(6):401.e1-401.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.06.010. Epub 2016 Jul 21. J Pediatr Urol. 2016. PMID: 27614698
-
Minimally Invasive Techniques for the Management of Adult UPJ Obstruction.Curr Urol Rep. 2016 May;17(5):39. doi: 10.1007/s11934-016-0593-3. Curr Urol Rep. 2016. PMID: 26968419 Review.
-
Trends in ureteropelvic junction obstruction management among urologists in the United States.Urology. 2005 Feb;65(2):260-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.09.051. Urology. 2005. PMID: 15708034
-
Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus antegrade endopyelotomy: comparison in 100 patients and a new algorithm for the minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.Urology. 2005 Nov;66(5 Suppl):47-51. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.06.115. Urology. 2005. PMID: 16194707
-
Ureteropelvic junction obstruction repair: when, how, what?Curr Opin Urol. 2004 Mar;14(2):55-9. doi: 10.1097/00042307-200403000-00002. Curr Opin Urol. 2004. PMID: 15075831 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of surgical and functional outcomes of open, laparoscopic and robotic pyeloplasty for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.Turk J Urol. 2014 Mar;40(1):24-30. doi: 10.5152/tud.2014.06956. Turk J Urol. 2014. PMID: 26328141 Free PMC article.
-
Minimal invasive pyeloplasty technique with vertical surgical approach: an alternative to laparoscopic pyeloplasty.Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2012 Feb;28(2):100-4. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2011.10.029. Epub 2012 Jan 14. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2012. PMID: 22313537 Free PMC article.
-
Minimal Invasive Treatment in Pelvic-Ureteric Junction Obstruction: A Comprehensive Review.Res Rep Urol. 2021 Aug 10;13:573-580. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S268569. eCollection 2021. Res Rep Urol. 2021. PMID: 34408990 Free PMC article. Review.
-
COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC AND OPEN PYELOPLASTY IMPACT ON COMFORT AND SUCCESS: A RETROSPECTIVE, SINGLE CENTER STUDY.Acta Clin Croat. 2023 Apr;62(1):75-81. doi: 10.20471/acc.2023.62.01.09. Acta Clin Croat. 2023. PMID: 38304363 Free PMC article.
-
Management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults.Nat Rev Urol. 2014 Nov;11(11):629-38. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2014.240. Epub 2014 Oct 7. Nat Rev Urol. 2014. PMID: 25287785 Review.
References
-
- Hsu TH, Streem SB, Nakada SY. Campbell-Walsh urology. 9th ed. Vol 2. Saunders, Elsevier Inc; 2007. Management of upper urinary tract obstruction; pp. 1231–8. Chapter 38.
-
- Streem SB. Editorial comments: Current techniques for treating ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Braz J Urol. 2000;26:83–4.
-
- O’Reilly PH, Brooman PJ, Mak S, Jones M, Pickup C, Atkinson C, et al. The long-term results of Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty. BJU Int. 2001;87:287–9. - PubMed
-
- Brooks JD, Kavoussi LR, Preminger GM, Schuessler WW, Moore RG. Comparison of open and endourological approaches to the obstructed ureteropelvic junction. Urology. 1995;46:791–5. - PubMed
-
- Dinlec CZ, Smith AD. Editorial comments: Current techniques for treating ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Braz J Urol. 2000;26:82.