Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jan;25(1):27-33.
doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.45533.

Minimally invasive surgical options for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: A significant step in the right direction

Affiliations

Minimally invasive surgical options for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: A significant step in the right direction

Stephanie J Symons et al. Indian J Urol. 2009 Jan.

Abstract

Open pyeloplasty is the gold standard treatment for adult ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) with published success rates consistently over 90%. In recent years, the management of UPJO has been revolutionized by the introduction of endoscopic procedures and laparoscopic techniques. We analyzed the long-term results of endoscopic and other minimal access approaches for the treatment of UPJO.Early results for endopyelotomy were promising but long-term results were not encouraging. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty technique is well defined and duplicates the surgical principles of conventional open pyeloplasty. With such a large variety of minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of UPJO available, the treatment choice for UPJO must be based on the success and morbidity of the procedures, the surgeon's experience, the cost of the treatment, and the patient's choice. We feel that with the technological advances in instrumentation coupled with a decrease in cost and improved training of urological surgeons, laparoscopic pyeloplasty may evolve to be the new "gold" standard for the treatment of UPJO.

Keywords: Acucise; balloon dilatation; endopyelotomy; laparoscopy; pelviureteric junction obstruction; robotic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hsu TH, Streem SB, Nakada SY. Campbell-Walsh urology. 9th ed. Vol 2. Saunders, Elsevier Inc; 2007. Management of upper urinary tract obstruction; pp. 1231–8. Chapter 38.
    1. Streem SB. Editorial comments: Current techniques for treating ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Braz J Urol. 2000;26:83–4.
    1. O’Reilly PH, Brooman PJ, Mak S, Jones M, Pickup C, Atkinson C, et al. The long-term results of Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty. BJU Int. 2001;87:287–9. - PubMed
    1. Brooks JD, Kavoussi LR, Preminger GM, Schuessler WW, Moore RG. Comparison of open and endourological approaches to the obstructed ureteropelvic junction. Urology. 1995;46:791–5. - PubMed
    1. Dinlec CZ, Smith AD. Editorial comments: Current techniques for treating ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Braz J Urol. 2000;26:82.