Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jan;83(985):17-22.
doi: 10.1259/bjr/16360063. Epub 2009 May 26.

Radiology reporting: a general practitioner's perspective

F M Grieve  1 , A A Plumb, S H Khan
Affiliations

Radiology reporting: a general practitioner's perspective

F M Grieve et al. Br J Radiol. 2010 Jan.

Abstract

Unlike hospital-based clinicians, general practitioners (GPs) lack direct contact with radiologists, and the radiology report is usually the sole method of communication from the radiologist to the GP. It is important to gain feedback regarding what GPs perceive as a good-quality radiology report, especially in the current climate of competition for provision of radiology services. The aims of this study are to determine the level of GP satisfaction with radiology reports, their perception of optimum report content and their preferences regarding the level of detail and report format. A questionnaire was sent to 100 GPs referring to our Trust for radiology services. GPs were generally satisfied with the content and clarity of reports that they receive, and gave suggestions on how reports could be improved. The majority of GPs were unfamiliar with the normal size ranges of frequently measured anatomical structures. Radiologists' recommendations for further treatment, referral and non-radiological investigation were viewed as valuable report components. When asked to rank preferences for ultrasound reports for the same patient with differing formats and levels of detail, GPs favoured detailed reports in a tabulated format. In conclusion, the majority of GPs like detailed reports and value the radiologist's opinion outside the remit of imaging when suggesting further patient management. Reporting the size of a structure without explanation of its significance can potentially cause confusion. It is important to know if GPs are satisfied with the radiology reports they receive so that we can uphold high communication standards and ultimately improve patient care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
General practitioner (GP) satisfaction scores for report content and clarity.
Figure 2
Figure 2
General practitioner (GP) familiarity with “normal” size ranges of structures. NA, not answered.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Preferred report for a “normal” abdominal ultrasound. GP, general practitioner.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Preferred report for an abdominal ultrasound with abnormal findings. GP, general practitioner.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Nurmi H. Voting procedures: a summary analysis. Br J Polit Sci 1983;13:181–208
    1. Kemeny J. Mathematics without numbers. Daedalus 1959;88:571–91
    1. Young HP, Levenglick A. A consistent extension of condorcet's election principle. SIAM J Appl Math 1978;35:285–300
    1. Royal CollegeofRadiologists Standards for the Reporting and Interpretation of Imaging Investigations. London, UK: The Royal College of Radiologists, 2006
    1. ACR PracticeGuidelineforCommunicationofDiagnosticImaging Reston, Virginia, USA: American College of Radiologists, 2005.