Changing perspectives in biobank research: from individual rights to concerns about public health regarding the return of results
- PMID: 19471310
- PMCID: PMC2987027
- DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2009.87
Changing perspectives in biobank research: from individual rights to concerns about public health regarding the return of results
Abstract
During the past decade, various guidelines that imply a duty for researchers to disclose information obtained through research to participants have emerged. The character and extent of this obligation have been debated extensively, with much attention devoted to the decisiveness of the validity and utility of the results in question. The aim of this paper is to argue that individual results from research on materials stored in large-scale biobanks, consisting of samples taken within the healthcare system or of altruistically donated materials, should not be returned. We will defend the thesis that medical research on these biobanks should be viewed as a collective project to improve public health, and that available resources should be utilized to pursue this goal. We argue that there is a need for a change of perspectives. Medical research should not primarily be viewed as a danger that individuals must be protected from, but rather be recognized as constituting a necessary defense against current and future diseases. Research that bears the prospect of advancing medicine and that can be carried out at no risk to individuals should be endorsed and facilitated. This calls for a shift of focus from autonomy and individual rights toward collective responsibility and solidarity.
Similar articles
-
The return of individual research findings in paediatric genetic research.J Med Ethics. 2011 Mar;37(3):179-83. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.037473. Epub 2010 Nov 8. J Med Ethics. 2011. PMID: 21059631
-
For the safety and benefit of current and future patients.Pathobiology. 2007;74(4):198-205. doi: 10.1159/000104445. Pathobiology. 2007. PMID: 17709960
-
Attitudes of the general public towards the disclosure of individual research results and incidental findings from biobank genomic research in Australia.Intern Med J. 2015 Dec;45(12):1274-9. doi: 10.1111/imj.12911. Intern Med J. 2015. PMID: 26390363
-
The interface of population-based cancer registries and biobanks in etiological and clinical research--current and future perspectives.Acta Oncol. 2010 Nov;49(8):1227-34. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2010.496792. Epub 2010 Jun 29. Acta Oncol. 2010. PMID: 20583946 Review.
-
Should genetic findings from genome research be reported back to the participants?Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2012 Oct 16;132(19):2190-3. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.12.0078. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2012. PMID: 23243670 Review. English, Norwegian.
Cited by
-
Population biobanks and returning individual research results: mission impossible or new directions?Hum Genet. 2011 Sep;130(3):393-401. doi: 10.1007/s00439-011-1021-x. Epub 2011 Jun 5. Hum Genet. 2011. PMID: 21643981 Review.
-
Biobanks-A Platform for Scientific and Biomedical Research.Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Jul 16;10(7):485. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10070485. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020. PMID: 32708805 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Improving international research with clinical specimens: 5 achievable objectives.J Proteome Res. 2012 Dec 7;11(12):5592-601. doi: 10.1021/pr300796m. Epub 2012 Oct 30. J Proteome Res. 2012. PMID: 22998582 Free PMC article.
-
Factors influencing public participation in biobanking.Eur J Hum Genet. 2014 Apr;22(4):445-51. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.174. Epub 2013 Aug 7. Eur J Hum Genet. 2014. PMID: 23921537 Free PMC article.
-
Returning Results: Let's Be Honest!Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2017 Mar;21(3):134-139. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2016.0395. Epub 2017 Feb 24. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2017. PMID: 28306398 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Santella RM. Approaches to DNA/RNA extraction and whole genome amplification. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:1585–1587. - PubMed
-
- Sjöholm MI, Dillner J, Carlson J. Assessing quality and functionality of DNA from fresh and archival dried blood spots and recommendations for quality control guidelines. Clin Chem. 2007;53:1401–1407. - PubMed
-
- Arnason V. Coding and consent: moral challenges of the database project in Iceland. Bioethics. 2004;18:27–49. - PubMed
-
- Caulfield T. Biobanks and blanket consent: the proper place of the public good and public perception rationales. Kings Law J. 2007;18:209–226.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous