Psychological adjustment among male partners in response to women's breast/ovarian cancer risk: a theoretical review of the literature
- PMID: 19472298
- DOI: 10.1002/pon.1582
Psychological adjustment among male partners in response to women's breast/ovarian cancer risk: a theoretical review of the literature
Abstract
Objective: For women at high risk of developing hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer the process of undergoing genetic testing is anxiety provoking and stressful, entailing difficult and complex decisions. Partners of high-risk women are frequently perceived by the women as a source of support during this challenging time. Utilising Self Regulatory Theory, this paper provides a theoretically guided overview of existing data to delineate how partners respond emotionally and behaviourally to the woman's high-risk status.
Methods: An extensive literature search was undertaken. Online searches of MEDLINE, CINAHL and PsycINFO databases were conducted, reference lists of all publications identified were examined; and the databases were searched for authors identified in these publications.
Results: The systematic search yielded 10 published studies on at-risk women and their male partners; one study did not investigate male partner distress as an outcome variable. Heterogeneity of methodology in this literature precluded quantitative meta-analyses of study outcomes. Review of the evidence suggests that the genetic testing process may be distressing for some partners, particularly for partners of women identified as mutation carriers. Associations were identified between partner distress and partner beliefs about the woman's perceived breast cancer risk; partner feelings of social separation and lack of couple communication; and partner perceptions of being alienated from the testing process. Lack of partner support was found to be associated with increased distress of the tested woman at the time of testing and following results disclosure. Data are lacking on the role of partner beliefs about breast cancer, partner perceived consequences of genetic testing, and personality factors such as information processing style, on partner distress.
Conclusions: The high level of behavioural and psychological interdependence that exists between a tested woman and her partner means that future research seeking to understand the coping and adjustment processes of partners needs to adopt a dyadic, transactional approach that is grounded in psychological theory. Specific suggestions for future research in this context are delineated.
(c) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Accommodating risk: responses to BRCA1/2 genetic testing of women who have had cancer.Soc Sci Med. 2004 Aug;59(3):553-65. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.11.025. Soc Sci Med. 2004. PMID: 15144764
-
Men at risk of being a mutation carrier for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer: an exploration of attitudes and psychological functioning during genetic testing.Eur J Hum Genet. 2001 Jul;9(7):492-500. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200668. Eur J Hum Genet. 2001. PMID: 11464240
-
A literature review of the psychological impact of genetic testing on breast cancer patients.Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Jul;62(1):13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.08.012. Epub 2005 Oct 19. Patient Educ Couns. 2006. PMID: 16242293 Review.
-
Interdependent anxiety and psychological distress in women with breast cancer and their partners.Psychooncology. 2007 Jul;16(7):634-43. doi: 10.1002/pon.1111. Psychooncology. 2007. PMID: 17094160 Clinical Trial.
-
Attitudes and psychological impact of genetic testing, genetic counseling, and breast cancer risk assessment among women at increased risk.Oncol Nurs Forum. 2003 Mar-Apr;30(2):241-6. doi: 10.1188/03.ONF.241-246. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2003. PMID: 12692658 Review.
Cited by
-
Individual differences in physical symptom burden and psychological responses in individuals with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Ann Hematol. 2016 Dec;95(12):1989-1997. doi: 10.1007/s00277-016-2790-z. Epub 2016 Aug 19. Ann Hematol. 2016. PMID: 27539615 Free PMC article.
-
Family Adjustment to Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: A Systematic Review.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 30;19(3):1603. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031603. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35162625 Free PMC article.
-
The Effects of Social Support on Health-Related Quality of Life of Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer.J Cancer Educ. 2016 Jun;31(2):244-52. doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0884-2. J Cancer Educ. 2016. PMID: 26174117
-
The importance of the dyad: Participant perspectives on sharing biomarker results in Alzheimer's disease research.Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2023 Aug 13;9(3):e12416. doi: 10.1002/trc2.12416. eCollection 2023 Jul-Sep. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2023. PMID: 37583545 Free PMC article.
-
Distress and the parenting dynamic among BRCA1/2 tested mothers and their partners.Health Psychol. 2014 Aug;33(8):765-73. doi: 10.1037/a0033418. Epub 2013 Jun 24. Health Psychol. 2014. PMID: 23795707 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical