Third-generation ceramic-on-ceramic bearing surfaces in revision total hip arthroplasty
- PMID: 19473806
- DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.04.016
Third-generation ceramic-on-ceramic bearing surfaces in revision total hip arthroplasty
Abstract
With an increase of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA), the choice of bearing surface becomes more important. Wear debris by conventional metal-on-polyethylene articulations may cause extensive osteolysis, especially in young patients. We analyzed the clinical and radiographic outcomes after revision THA using third-generation ceramic-on-ceramic bearing surfaces in 42 hips. The mean age of the patients was 48.8 years (32-59 years), and the mean duration of follow-up monitoring was 5.4 years (3.2-8.0 years). At final follow-up examination, the average Harris Hip Score was 91.3. Although minor complications were observed in 6 hips (14.3%), no hips required additional revision surgery. No hip showed radiolucent lines, acetabular cup migration, or osteolysis. Our data show that clinical and radiographic outcomes after revision THA using third-generation ceramic-on-ceramic bearing surfaces are favorable. Ceramic-on-ceramic bearing surfaces can be preferentially considered for revision THA, especially in young patients. Further studies with long-term follow-up data are warranted.
Similar articles
-
Ten-year results after cementless THA with a sandwich-type alumina ceramic bearing.Orthopedics. 2010 Nov 2;33(11):796. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20100924-11. Orthopedics. 2010. PMID: 21053885
-
Ceramic-on-ceramic THA associated with fewer dislocations and less muscle degeneration by preserving muscle progenitors.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Dec;473(12):3762-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4378-7. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015. PMID: 26054482 Free PMC article.
-
Revision of ceramic head fracture after third generation ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jan;29(1):214-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.04.007. Epub 2013 May 14. J Arthroplasty. 2014. PMID: 23683525
-
Hard bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty.Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 1998 Apr;27(4):283-92. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 1998. PMID: 9586727 Review.
-
Advantages and disadvantages of ceramic on ceramic total hip arthroplasty: a review.Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2012 Sep;156(3):204-12. doi: 10.5507/bp.2012.063. Epub 2012 Oct 4. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2012. PMID: 23069885 Review.
Cited by
-
Cementless Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with Ceramic Articulation.Hip Pelvis. 2015 Dec;27(4):223-31. doi: 10.5371/hp.2015.27.4.223. Epub 2015 Dec 30. Hip Pelvis. 2015. PMID: 27536630 Free PMC article.
-
Early reactive synovitis and osteolysis after total hip arthroplasty.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Dec;468(12):3278-85. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1361-1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010. PMID: 20419484 Free PMC article.
-
What every surgeon should know about Ceramic-on-Ceramic bearings in young patients.EFORT Open Rev. 2017 Mar 13;1(4):107-111. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.1.000027. eCollection 2016 Apr. EFORT Open Rev. 2017. PMID: 28461936 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Development of ceramic-on-ceramic implants for total hip arthroplasty.Orthop Surg. 2010 Aug;2(3):175-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1757-7861.2010.00083.x. Orthop Surg. 2010. PMID: 22009945 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical