INTERMACS: interval analysis of registry data
- PMID: 19476831
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.11.016
INTERMACS: interval analysis of registry data
Abstract
Background: The Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) is an NIH-sponsored registry of US FDA-approved mechanical circulatory support devices (MCSDs) used for destination therapy, bridge to transplantation (BTT), or recovery of the heart. INTERMACS data were analyzed through the most recent quarter ending March 31, 2008.
Study design: INTERMACS variables include demographics, patient outcomes (survival and adverse events), hemodynamic data, and laboratory values. Data were analyzed with competing outcomes methods. Risk factors were identified for death and transplantation.
Results: Ninety-four sites have prospectively enrolled 483 patients in INTERMACS (BTT, 80%; destination therapy, 15%; bridge to recovery, 5%). Forty-two percent of patients had critical cardiogenic shock before implantation, 38% had progressive circulatory decline despite inotropic agents, and 8% were stable but inotropic agent-dependent. The remaining 12% had recurrent advanced heart failure, severe exercise intolerance, or advanced class III heart failure. At 6 months postimplantation, the competing outcomes for the 483 patients included ongoing support (42%), cardiac transplantation (33%), cardiac recovery with pump removal (3%), or death (22%). The most common causes of death were central nervous system events (11%), cardiovascular failure (8%), or respiratory failure (8%). Less common causes were infection (4%), device malfunction (4%), and liver failure (3%). Survival for BTT and destination therapy were similar (p = 0.53). Patient profile at the time of implantation (critical cardiogenic shock versus others) influenced survival (p = 0.007), as did device configuration (left ventricular assist device versus biventricular ventricular assist device; p < 0.0001).
Conclusions: INTERMACS has increasing participation among domestic MCSD centers. The influence of preimplantation patient condition on survival underscores the importance of timely referral before critical cardiogenic shock occurs. As more devices achieve US FDA approval, INTERMACS will become useful for comparing MCSDs.
Similar articles
-
Predictors of death and transplant in patients with a mechanical circulatory support device: a multi-institutional study.J Heart Lung Transplant. 2009 Jan;28(1):44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2008.10.011. Epub 2008 Dec 12. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2009. PMID: 19134530
-
Results of the post-U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approval study with a continuous flow left ventricular assist device as a bridge to heart transplantation: a prospective study using the INTERMACS (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support).J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 May 10;57(19):1890-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.10.062. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011. PMID: 21545946
-
Survival after biventricular assist device implantation: an analysis of the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support database.J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011 Aug;30(8):862-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2011.04.004. Epub 2011 May 31. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011. PMID: 21621423
-
Cardiac extracorporeal life support: state of the art in 2007.Cardiol Young. 2007 Sep;17 Suppl 2:104-15. doi: 10.1017/S1047951107001217. Cardiol Young. 2007. PMID: 18039404 Review.
-
[Uni- or biventricular circulatory assist devices. Selection criteria and patients' follow-up, choice of device].Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1996 Nov;89 Spec No 6:55-63. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1996. PMID: 9092429 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Mechanical Circulatory Support for the Failing Heart: Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.Ochsner J. 2016 Fall;16(3):263-9. Ochsner J. 2016. PMID: 27660575 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Development of an inlet pressure sensor for control in a left ventricular assist device.ASAIO J. 2010 May-Jun;56(3):180-5. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0b013e3181d2a56e. ASAIO J. 2010. PMID: 20335797 Free PMC article.
-
Technological advancements in the care of the trauma patient.Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2012 Jun;38(3):241-51. doi: 10.1007/s00068-011-0160-z. Epub 2011 Nov 9. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2012. PMID: 26815955
-
Transapical miniaturized ventricular assist device: design and initial testing.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Sep;142(3):668-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.01.011. Epub 2011 Feb 12. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011. PMID: 21320708 Free PMC article.
-
Forensic Considerations in a Series of 14 Deaths of Patients with a Left Ventricular Assist Device.Acad Forensic Pathol. 2019 Sep;9(3-4):200-211. doi: 10.1177/1925362119893459. Epub 2020 Jan 31. Acad Forensic Pathol. 2019. PMID: 32110255 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials