Wait times for surgical and adjuvant radiation treatment of breast cancer in Canada and the United States: greater socioeconomic inequity in America
- PMID: 19480739
- PMCID: PMC2910751
- DOI: 10.25011/cim.v32i3.6113
Wait times for surgical and adjuvant radiation treatment of breast cancer in Canada and the United States: greater socioeconomic inequity in America
Abstract
Purpose: The demand for cancer care has increased among aging North American populations as cancer treatment innovations have proliferated. Gaps between supply and demand may be growing. This study examined whether socioeconomic status has a differential effect on waits for surgical and adjuvant radiation treatment (RT) of breast cancer in Canada and the US.
Methods: Ontario and California cancer registries provided 929 and 984 breast cancer cases diagnosed between 1998 and 2000 in diverse urban and rural places. Residence-based socioeconomic data were taken from censuses. Cancer care variables were reliably abstracted from health records: stage, receipt of surgery and RT, and waits from diagnosis to initial and initial to adjuvant treatment. Median waits were compared within- and between-country with the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U-test. Categorically long, age-adjusted wait comparisons used the Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test.
Results: There were significant associations between lower socioeconomic status and longer surgical waits, lower access to adjuvant RT and to longer RT waits across diverse places in California. None were observed in Ontario. The two cohorts did not practically differ on access to surgery or on surgical waits. Compared with their counterparts in California, low-income Ontarians, particularly those in small urban places, gained greater access to RT, while high-income Americans had shorter waits for RT.
Conclusions: This historical study contextualized Canada's "waiting-list problems" with evidence on breast cancer care, where lower income Americans seemed to have waited as long as similar Canadians. Many more low-income Americans seemed to experience the longest wait of all for adjuvant care. They simply did not receive it. In contrast to stark American socioeconomic inequity, this study evidenced remarkable equity in Canadian breast cancer care.
Similar articles
-
Breast cancer care in the Canada and the United States: ecological comparisons of extremely impoverished and affluent urban neighborhoods.Health Place. 2010 Jan;16(1):156-63. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.09.011. Epub 2009 Sep 30. Health Place. 2010. PMID: 19840902 Free PMC article.
-
Breast cancer survival in ontario and california, 1998-2006: socioeconomic inequity remains much greater in the United States.Ann Epidemiol. 2009 Feb;19(2):121-4. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2008.10.010. Ann Epidemiol. 2009. PMID: 19185806 Free PMC article.
-
Income and long-term breast cancer survival: comparisons of vulnerable urban places in Ontario and California.Breast J. 2010 Jul-Aug;16(4):416-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2010.00922.x. Epub 2010 Apr 21. Breast J. 2010. PMID: 20443784 Free PMC article.
-
Cancer survival in Ontario, 1986-2003: evidence of equitable advances across most diverse urban and rural places.Can J Public Health. 2008 Jan-Feb;99(1):12-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03403733. Can J Public Health. 2008. PMID: 18435383 Free PMC article.
-
Does socioeconomic status affect lengthy wait time in Canada? Evidence from Canadian Community Health Surveys.Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Apr;19(3):369-383. doi: 10.1007/s10198-017-0889-3. Epub 2017 Apr 7. Eur J Health Econ. 2018. PMID: 28389739
Cited by
-
Short course radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost for stage I-II breast cancer, early toxicities of a randomized clinical trial.Radiat Oncol. 2012 Jun 1;7:80. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-7-80. Radiat Oncol. 2012. PMID: 22656865 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
What Prevents Men Aged 40-64 Years from Prostate Cancer Screening in Namibia?J Cancer Epidemiol. 2016;2016:7962502. doi: 10.1155/2016/7962502. Epub 2016 Jan 10. J Cancer Epidemiol. 2016. PMID: 26880917 Free PMC article.
-
Breast cancer care in the Canada and the United States: ecological comparisons of extremely impoverished and affluent urban neighborhoods.Health Place. 2010 Jan;16(1):156-63. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.09.011. Epub 2009 Sep 30. Health Place. 2010. PMID: 19840902 Free PMC article.
-
A case study and state of science review: private versus public healthcare financing.Glob J Health Sci. 2011 Dec 29;4(1):118-26. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v4n1p118. Glob J Health Sci. 2011. PMID: 22980105 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Breast cancer survival in ontario and california, 1998-2006: socioeconomic inequity remains much greater in the United States.Ann Epidemiol. 2009 Feb;19(2):121-4. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2008.10.010. Ann Epidemiol. 2009. PMID: 19185806 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Romanow RJ. Building on values: The future of health care in Canada. Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada; Saskatoon, SK: 2002.
-
- Standing Senate Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology. Recommendations for reform. Vol. 6. Ottawa: 2002. The health of Canadians—the federal role.
-
- Mackillop WJ, Zhou S, Groome P, et al. Changes in the use of radiotherapy in Ontario, 1984–1995. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;44:355–62. - PubMed
-
- Mackillop WJ, Zhou Y, Quirt CF. A comparison of delays in the treatment of cancer with radiation in Canada and the United States. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;32:531–9. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical