Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Aug;47(4):267-89.
doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2009.04.001. Epub 2009 Apr 28.

Predicting change in children's aggression and victimization using classroom-level descriptive norms of aggression and pro-social behavior

Affiliations

Predicting change in children's aggression and victimization using classroom-level descriptive norms of aggression and pro-social behavior

Sterett H Mercer et al. J Sch Psychol. 2009 Aug.

Abstract

This study examined aggressive and pro-social classroom descriptive norms as predictors of change in aggression and victimization during middle childhood. Participants included 948 children in third through fifth grade. Measures of teacher-reported aggressive and peer-reported pro-social descriptive norms were completed at the onset of the study. Children completed self-report measures of aggression and victimization on three occasions during one academic year. Multilevel growth models were analyzed to determine the amount of student-reported change in aggression and victimization attributable to the classroom norm variables. Results indicated that students in classrooms with higher initial mean levels of aggression reported larger increases in aggression and victimization over the school year. In contrast, boys with higher initial levels of aggression reported smaller increases in aggression than boys with lower initial levels of aggression, and both boys and girls with higher initial aggression reported declining victimization over the school year. Pro-social classroom norms were unrelated to change in aggression and victimization. The implications of the findings for future studies on the influence of classroom social norms as well as interventions for aggression and victimization are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Allison PD. Missing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2002.
    1. Baker JA. Are we missing the forest for the trees? Considering the social context of school violence. Journal of School Psychology. 1998;36:29–44.
    1. Buhs ES, Ladd GW, Herald SL. Peer exclusion and victimization: Processes that mediate the relation between peer group rejection and children’s classroom engagement and achievement? Journal of Educational Psychology. 2006;98:1–13.
    1. Cialdini RB, Reno RR, Kallgren CA. A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and re-evaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 1990;24:201–234.
    1. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2. New York: Academic Press; 1988.

Publication types