Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jul;6(7):500-2.
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1337. Epub 2009 May 31.

Protein interaction platforms: visualization of interacting proteins in yeast

Affiliations

Protein interaction platforms: visualization of interacting proteins in yeast

Alexa M Schmitz et al. Nat Methods. 2009 Jul.

Abstract

Here we describe the protein interaction platform assay, a method for identifying interacting proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This assay relies on the reovirus scaffolding protein microNS, which forms large focal inclusions in living cells. When a query protein is fused to microNS and potential interaction partners are fused to a fluorescent reporter, interactors can be identified by screening for yeast that display fluorescent foci.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Development of PIP assay in yeast. (a,b) Yeast cells expressing wild-type (a) or mutant (b) alleles of GFP-μNS at 3–4 h post-induction of fusion protein expression. The left panel in a is a fluorescence image; the right panel shows simultaneous imaging of phase and fluorescence illumination. (c,d) Schematic and representative images of PIP. When fused to μNS, protein A is recruited to large platforms. If protein B does not interact with protein A (c), then the localization pattern of protein B is unaltered in the presence of μNS–protein A. Alternatively, if protein B interacts with protein A (d), then a protein B– GFP fusion appears as fluorescent foci. Scale bars are approximately 2 μm.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Detection of previously characterized chaperone-effector interactions via PIP. Each image is representative of yeast expressing designated effectors (e) and chaperones (c). The effectors and chaperones are fused to either GFP or μNS as designated. (−) indicates an absence of chaperones or effectors in these cells. (a) Yeast expressing nontoxic effectors IpaB and IpaC with or without their cognate chaperone IpgC. The image of GFP-IpgC (alone) is duplicated. (b) Yeast expressing toxic effectors and their respective chaperones, as indicated. IpgB2* refers to the mutant protein IpgB2 W62A. Images in the first three rows in b represent 3-s exposures normalized to display pixels visible over a defined linear range, thus demonstrating relative levels of expression of these effectors. Scale bars are approximately 2 μm.
Figure 3
Figure 3
S. flexneri effector-chaperone interactions by PIP. Yeast co-expressing the designated effectors and chaperones were visualized at 3–4 h post-induction of fusion protein expression. The first column shows yeast expressing each effector fused to GFP. The second through fifth columns show yeast co-expressing each effector fused to GFP along with each of the four chaperones fused to μNS. The last column shows yeast co-expressing the effectors fused to μNS and Spa15 fused to GFP. Scale bars are approximately 2 μm.

References

    1. Fields S, Song O. Nature. 1989;340:245–246. - PubMed
    1. Remy I, Michnick SW. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1999;96:5394–5399. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Miller CL, et al. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 2007;6:1027–1038. - PubMed
    1. Nguyen CL, Eichwald C, Nibert ML, Munger K. J. Virol. 2007;81:13533–13543. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Broering TJ, et al. J. Virol. 2005;79:6194–6206. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances