Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2009 Jun;77(3):486-503.
doi: 10.1037/a0015168.

A meta-analytic review of depression prevention programs for children and adolescents: factors that predict magnitude of intervention effects

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

A meta-analytic review of depression prevention programs for children and adolescents: factors that predict magnitude of intervention effects

Eric Stice et al. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009 Jun.

Abstract

In this meta-analytic review, the authors summarized the effects of depression prevention programs for youth as well as investigated participant, intervention, provider, and research design features associated with larger effects. They identified 47 trials that evaluated 32 prevention programs, producing 60 intervention effect sizes. The average effect for depressive symptoms from pre-to-posttreatment (r = .15) and pretreatment to-follow-up (r = .11) were small, but 13 (41%) prevention programs produced significant reductions in depressive symptoms and 4 (13%) produced significant reductions in risk for future depressive disorder onset relative to control groups. Larger effects emerged for programs targeting high-risk individuals, samples with more females, samples with older adolescents, programs with a shorter duration and with homework assignments, and programs delivered by professional interventionists. Intervention content (e.g., a focus on problem-solving training or reducing negative cognitions) and design features (e.g., use of random assignment and structured interviews) were unrelated to effect sizes. Results suggest that depression prevention efforts produce a higher yield if they incorporate factors associated with larger intervention effects (e.g., selective programs with a shorter duration that include homework).

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Arnett JJ. Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist. 2000;55:469–480. - PubMed
    1. Baranowski T, Cullen K, Nicklas T, Thompson D, Baranowski J. School-based obesity prevention: A blueprint for taming the epidemic. American Journal of Public Health. 2002;26:486–493. - PubMed
    1. Barrett P, Farrell L, Ollendick T, Dadds M. Long-term outcomes of an Australian universal prevention trial of anxiety and depression symptoms in children and youth: An evaluation of the friends program. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology. 2006;35:403–411. - PubMed
    1. Beardslee W, Gladstone T, Wright E, Cooper A. A family-based approach to the prevention of depressive symptoms in children at risk: Evidence of parental and child change. Pediatrics. 2003;112:119–131. - PubMed
    1. Bearman SK, Stice E, Chase A. Evaluation of an intervention targeting both depressive and bulimic pathology: A randomized prevention trial. Behavior Therapy. 2003;34:277–293. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types