Tensions in the parent and adult child relationship: Links to solidarity and ambivalence
- PMID: 19485648
- PMCID: PMC2690709
- DOI: 10.1037/a0015196
Tensions in the parent and adult child relationship: Links to solidarity and ambivalence
Abstract
Tensions are normative in the parent and adult child relationship, but there is little research on the topics that cause the most tension or whether tensions are associated with overall relationship quality. In this study, adult sons and daughters, age 22 to 49, and their mothers and fathers (N = 158 families, 474 individuals) reported the intensity of different tension topics and relationship quality (solidarity and ambivalence) with one another. Tensions varied between and within families by generation, gender, and age of offspring. Compared to tensions regarding individual issues, tensions regarding the relationship were associated with lower affective solidarity and greater ambivalence. Findings are consistent with the developmental schism hypothesis, which indicates that parent-child tensions are common and are the result of discrepancies in developmental needs that vary by generation, gender, and age.
(c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved.
References
-
- Akiyama H, Antonucci T, Takahashi K, Langfahl ES. Negative interactions in close relationships across the life span. Journals of Gerontology: Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences. 2003;58:P70–P79. - PubMed
-
- Alfieri T, Ruble DN, Higgins ET. Gender stereotypes during adolescence: Developmental changes and the transition to junior high school. Developmental Psychology. 1996;32:1129–1137.
-
- Bengtson V, Giarrusso R, Mabry JB, Silverstein M. Solidarity, conflict, and ambivalence: Complementary or competing perspectives on intergenerational relationships? Journal of Marriage and the Family. 2002;64:568–576.
-
- Bengtson VL, Kuypers JA. Generational differences and the developmental stake. Aging and Human Development. 1971;2:249–260.
-
- Bengtson VL, Roberts REL. Intergenerational solidarity in aging families: An example of formal theory construction. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 1991;53:856–870.
